eki no mae no miti ha abunai node, kodomo to issyo no toki ha hodoukyou wo tukatta hou ga ii desu.

Questions & Answers about eki no mae no miti ha abunai node, kodomo to issyo no toki ha hodoukyou wo tukatta hou ga ii desu.

Why are there two in 駅の前の道?

Japanese often links nouns with .

  • 駅の前 = the front of the station / the area in front of the station
  • 駅の前の道 = the road in front of the station

So the first connects and , and the second connects the whole phrase 駅の前 to .


Why is it 道は instead of 道が?

marks as the topic: as for the road in front of the station...

This works well because the sentence is making a general comment or warning about that road.
If you used , it would sound more like you are specifically identifying that road as the dangerous one.

So here:

  • 道は危ない = That road is dangerous / As for that road, it’s dangerous

There is no subject like you in the sentence. Who is supposed to use the footbridge?

Japanese often leaves the subject unstated when it is obvious from context.

Here, the sentence is giving general advice, so the understood subject is something like:

  • you
  • one
  • people

In natural English, that becomes something like you should use the footbridge or it’s better to use the footbridge.


Why is it 危ないので? What does ので do here?

ので means because or since.

  • 危ないので = because it is dangerous

Compared with から, ので often sounds:

  • a little softer
  • more explanatory
  • a bit more polite or less direct

That makes it very common in warnings, explanations, and advice.


Why is it 危ないので and not 危ないですので?

In Japanese, non-final parts of a sentence are often kept in plain form, even when the sentence ends politely.

So this pattern is very normal:

  • 危ないので、... いいです

The politeness is carried by the final です.
A lot of learners expect politeness on every part of the sentence, but Japanese does not always work that way.


Does 子供 mean child or children here?

It can mean either, depending on context.

Japanese nouns usually do not have to show singular/plural clearly. So 子供 can mean:

  • a child
  • children
  • your child / your kids, depending on context

In this sentence, it is probably general advice, so English may naturally translate it as when you are with children, but when you are with a child is also grammatically possible.


Why is it 子供と一緒のとき? Why is there a after 一緒?

Here, 一緒の is modifying とき.

  • 子供と一緒 = together with a child / children
  • 子供と一緒のとき = when you are together with a child / children

A useful comparison:

  • 一緒に
    • verb
      • 子供と一緒に歩く = walk together with a child
  • 一緒の
    • noun
      • 子供と一緒のとき = when you are with a child

So 一緒にとき would be wrong, because does not connect directly to the noun とき in this structure.


Why is it ときは and not just とき or ときに?

adds a topic/contrast nuance.

  • 子供と一緒のときは = when you’re with children, (in that case)...

It highlights that situation as an important condition.

Compare:

  • とき = neutral when
  • ときに = at the time when / when
  • ときは = when it comes to the case of... / when..., then...

In advice sentences, ときは is very common because it sets up the condition clearly.


What exactly is 歩道橋?

歩道橋 is a pedestrian overpass, footbridge, or pedestrian bridge over a road.

It is specifically for people to cross safely above traffic.

The word breaks down like this:

  • 歩道 = sidewalk / pedestrian path
  • = bridge

So it is not just any bridge; it is a bridge meant for pedestrians.


What does 使ったほうがいい mean grammatically?

This is a very common pattern:

It means:

  • it’s better to...
  • you should...
  • it would be better to...

So:

  • 歩道橋を使ったほうがいいです = it’s better to use the footbridge

Literally, ほう means side or option, so the pattern originally has the sense of the option of doing X is better.


Why is 使った in the past form if the advice is about the future?

Because in Vたほうがいい, the form is part of a fixed grammar pattern. It does not mean the action already happened.

So:

  • 行ったほうがいい = you should go
  • 見たほうがいい = you should see/watch
  • 使ったほうがいい = you should use

This is one of those cases where the past form is used for grammar, not for actual past time.


Why does the sentence say 歩道橋を使う? Why not use a verb like cross?

Japanese often uses 使う (to use) for things like facilities, tools, or options.

So 歩道橋を使う means use the footbridge as the safe route.

A different sentence could use 渡る:

  • 歩道橋を渡る = cross the footbridge

The difference is:

  • 使う focuses on choosing/utilizing it
  • 渡る focuses on the physical act of crossing it

In this sentence, 使う fits well because the speaker is giving practical advice about what option to choose.


Why is there a comma after ので?

The comma separates the reason from the main advice:

  • 駅の前の道は危ないので、 = Because the road in front of the station is dangerous,
  • 子供と一緒のときは歩道橋を使ったほうがいいです。 = when you’re with children, it’s better to use the footbridge.

Japanese commas often show a natural pause and make longer sentences easier to read.

AI Language TutorTry it ↗
Your avatar
How do verb conjugations work in Japanese?
Japanese verbs conjugate based on tense, politeness, and mood. For example, the polite present form adds ‑ます to the verb stem, while the past tense uses ‑ました. Unlike English, Japanese verbs don't change based on the subject — the same form works for "I", "you", and "they".

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Japanese

Master Japanese — from eki no mae no miti ha abunai node, kodomo to issyo no toki ha hodoukyou wo tukatta hou ga ii desu to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • AI tutor to answer your grammar questions