Volevamo partire, ma abbiamo dovuto disdire tutto per un'urgenza.

Questions & Answers about Volevamo partire, ma abbiamo dovuto disdire tutto per un'urgenza.

Why do we use the imperfetto for volevamo but the passato prossimo for abbiamo dovuto?
This is the core of how past-tense modals work! Volevamo describes an ongoing past intention or state of mind (we wanted to leave, but the action wasn't completed). Abbiamo dovuto is a sudden, completed action (we were forced to cancel, and we actually did it).
What if we had used the imperfetto for both, saying dovevamo disdire?
If you say dovevamo disdire, it means 'we were supposed to cancel' (an ongoing obligation), but it leaves it a mystery whether you actually did it or not. Using the passato prossimo (abbiamo dovuto disdire) confirms that the cancellation definitely happened.
Why does dovere use avere as its helper verb here (abbiamo dovuto) instead of essere?
In the passato prossimo, modal verbs usually 'borrow' the helper verb of the infinitive that follows them. Because disdire (to cancel) takes avere, the modal verb jumping in front of it must also take avere. If the action we had to do was a verb taking essere, like partire, it would be siamo dovuti partire.
Why use per in per un'urgenza? Doesn't per mean 'for'?
While per often means 'for', it is also commonly used in Italian to express cause, meaning 'due to' or 'because of' when followed by a noun. You could also say a causa di un'urgenza, but per is very natural and concise here.

Learn Volevamo partire, ma abbiamo dovuto disdire tutto per un'urgenza and more in Italian

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free