Si salimos ahora, llegaremos en treinta minutos y todavía habrá tiempo para tomar un café.

In Spanish, after si for a real, likely condition, you normally use the present tense, not the future.

So:

• Si salimos ahora, llegaremos... = If we leave now, we’ll arrive...

Not:

• Si saldremos ahora... ❌

This is a very common pattern:

• Si tengo tiempo, voy.
• Si vienes temprano, cenamos.
• Si estudias, aprobarás.

A useful rule:

• si + present, then often future / present / imperative in the main clause.

It can mean both, depending on context:

• present: we leave / we’re leaving
• preterite: we left

In this sentence, it clearly means present because the rest of the sentence talks about a future result:

• Si salimos ahora, llegaremos...
• If we leave now, we’ll arrive...

The word ahora also strongly supports the present meaning here.

Because it expresses the result of the condition:

• Si salimos ahora = the condition
• llegaremos en treinta minutos = what will happen if that condition is met

So llegaremos is the simple future of llegar:

• yo llegaré
• tú llegarás
• él/ella llegará
• nosotros llegaremos

Spanish often uses the future here just like English:

• If we leave now, we’ll arrive in thirty minutes.

Here en treinta minutos means in thirty minutes.

With time expressions, en can often mean:

• within / in (after this amount of time)

So:

• Llegaremos en treinta minutos = We’ll arrive in thirty minutes

Be careful not to confuse this with duration in every situation. In many contexts:

• en una hora = in an hour
• en dos días = in two days

Here it refers to the time until arrival.

Todavía means still.

So:

• habrá tiempo = there will be time
• todavía habrá tiempo = there will still be time

It adds the idea that even after arriving, enough time remains for the next activity.

In this sentence, it emphasizes that arriving in thirty minutes still leaves room to do something else:

• tomar un café

Spanish uses haber in expressions like hay tiempo, había tiempo, habrá tiempo to mean there is/was/will be time.

So:

• hay tiempo = there is time
• había tiempo = there was time
• habrá tiempo = there will be time

This is an impersonal use of haber, like:

• hay un problema
• había mucha gente
• habrá una reunión

You do not use ser for this idea.

Para + infinitive is a very common way to express purpose or what something is enough for.

Here:

• habrá tiempo para tomar un café
• literally: there will be time to have a coffee

So para tomar means to drink/have in the sense of purpose.

Similar examples:

• No tengo tiempo para estudiar.
• Tenemos dinero para viajar.
• Hay sitio para sentarse.

Yes, tomar can mean to take, but in Spain it is also very commonly used to mean to have/drink something.

So:

• tomar un café = to have a coffee
• tomar una cerveza = to have a beer
• tomar el desayuno = to have breakfast

In Spain, tomar is very natural here.
You may also hear beber café, but tomar un café sounds more idiomatic in this kind of sentence.

In Spanish, when talking about having one coffee as an item or order, it’s very natural to use the article:

• tomar un café = to have a coffee

This is similar to English have a coffee.

If you said just tomar café, that usually means to drink coffee more generally, as a substance or habit.

Compare:

• Me gusta tomar café por la mañana. = I like drinking coffee in the morning.
• Vamos a tomar un café. = Let’s go have a coffee.

It is normal and recommended because the sentence begins with a conditional si clause:

• Si salimos ahora, llegaremos...

In Spanish, when the subordinate clause comes first, a comma is commonly used before the main clause.

If the order were reversed, the comma would usually disappear:

• Llegaremos en treinta minutos si salimos ahora.

So the comma helps separate:

1. the condition
2. the result

No. Salgamos is the present subjunctive, and it is not used after si in this kind of real condition.

Correct:

• Si salimos ahora, llegaremos...

Not:

• Si salgamos ahora... ❌

After si, Spanish commonly uses:

• present indicative for real or likely conditions
• imperfect subjunctive for hypothetical/unreal conditions

For example:

• Si salimos ahora, llegaremos pronto. = real possibility
• Si saliéramos ahora, llegaríamos pronto. = hypothetical

This is a real condition or first conditional type sentence.

Structure:

• Si + present indicative
• future / present / imperative in the main clause

Here:

• Si salimos ahora = if we leave now
• llegaremos... y todavía habrá... = we’ll arrive... and there will still be...

It refers to a realistic future possibility.

Other examples:

• Si vienes, te lo explico.
• Si hace buen tiempo, iremos a la playa.
• Si tienes hambre, come algo.

Because the sentence contains two future results linked by y:

1. llegaremos en treinta minutos
   = we’ll arrive in thirty minutes

2. todavía habrá tiempo para tomar un café
   = there will still be time to have a coffee

Both actions are consequences of the condition si salimos ahora.

So the structure is basically:

• If we leave now, [result 1] and [result 2].

In this sentence, todavía and aún usually mean the same thing:

• todavía habrá tiempo
• aún habrá tiempo

Both can mean there will still be time.

In everyday Spanish in Spain, todavía is extremely common and very natural.
Aún can sound slightly more formal or literary in some contexts, though it is also common.

For a learner, todavía is a very safe choice.

Yes. You could say:

• Llegaremos en treinta minutos y todavía habrá tiempo para tomar un café si salimos ahora.

This is grammatically correct, but the original version sounds more natural if you want to emphasize the condition first:

• Si salimos ahora, ...

Starting with si salimos ahora makes the logic very clear right away:

1. condition first
2. consequences after

That word order is very common in both Spanish and English.