Breakdown of Il veggente dice che sono in pericolo, ma io non lo penso.
essere
to be
io
I
ma
but
non
not
in
in / made of (material)
dire
to say, to tell
lo
him/it (direct object)
pensare
to think
il pericolo
danger
che
that (conjunction introducing a clause)
il veggente
clairvoyant
Questions & Answers about Il veggente dice che sono in pericolo, ma io non lo penso.
What exactly does lo replace in this sentence?
It acts as a pro-clause, meaning it replaces the entire previous statement che sono in pericolo (that I am in danger). In English, we usually say 'I do not think so,' but in Italian, you use the direct object pronoun lo to represent the whole believed idea.
Why do we use lo here instead of ci for the verb pensare?
When pensare means 'to hold an opinion' or 'to believe a fact,' it takes a direct object. Therefore, the entire clause is replaced by the direct object pronoun lo. You would use ci (pensarci) when it means 'to direct your mind toward something' or 'to think about something' (for example, ci penso io - I will take care of it or I will think about it).
If I did not use lo and repeated the whole thought, would I still use the indicative sono?
No. If you expanded the second half, the negative verb of opinion non penso requires either the subjunctive or an infinitive. Because the subject is 'I' for both verbs, you would use di plus the infinitive: ma io non penso di essere in pericolo.
Why is there no subjunctive after dice che in the first clause?
When dire is used simply to report a statement or fact ('he says that...'), it takes the indicative mood, which is why we see sono. It generally only triggers the subjunctive when used to express an order or command ('he tells me to...').
Learn Il veggente dice che sono in pericolo, ma io non lo penso and more in Italian
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free