Non che voglia creare un'incomprensione, ma c'è stato un intoppo.

Questions & Answers about Non che voglia creare un'incomprensione, ma c'è stato un intoppo.

Why do we use the subjunctive for voglia but the indicative for c'è stato?
This showcases the non che... ma... (not that... but...) structure. You use the subjunctive (voglia) for the rejected reason because you are treating it as non-factual or hypothetical. You then use the indicative (c'è stato) for the real reason because you are stating an actual fact.
Since voglia is the present subjunctive, it could mean I, you, he, or she. How do we know it means 'I want' here?
In the present subjunctive, the first three singular forms of volere are all identical: voglia. Context almost always makes it clear, as the speaker is usually explaining their own intentions. If it were truly ambiguous in conversation, you would simply add the pronoun for clarity, such as Non che io voglia...
What kind of problem is an intoppo?
Un intoppo is a snag, a hitch, or a minor obstacle. It implies a temporary delay or a complication rather than a catastrophic failure. It comes from the verb intoppare, which means to stumble or bump into something.
Why is there an apostrophe in un'incomprensione but not in un intoppo?
This is a strict spelling rule based on gender that trips up many learners. Incomprensione is a feminine noun starting with a vowel, so the article una drops its final letter and takes an apostrophe to become un'. Intoppo is a masculine noun, so it uses the standard masculine article un, which never takes an apostrophe.

Learn Non che voglia creare un'incomprensione, ma c'è stato un intoppo and more in Italian

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free