Breakdown of El niño está quieto y lleva un minuto sin llorar, pero el problema es agónico.
ser
to be
y
and
el niño
the boy
pero
but
Questions & Answers about El niño está quieto y lleva un minuto sin llorar, pero el problema es agónico.
Why do we use lleva here to mean "hasn't cried"?
In Spanish, the structure llevar + [time period] + sin + [infinitive] is the most natural way to say you haven't done something for a certain amount of time. While you could literally translate "hasn't cried in a minute" as no ha llorado en un minuto, native speakers strongly prefer lleva un minuto sin llorar (literally "he carries a minute without crying").
I thought "quiet" was translated as quieto. Why does the English translation say "still"?
Quieto is a classic false friend! It actually means "still" or "motionless," not "quiet" (silent). If you want to say someone is being quiet or not making noise, you would use callado. In this sentence, the boy is physically still, and the next phrase (sin llorar) clarifies that he is also not crying.
Why do we use está with quieto but es with agónico?
We use está for temporary states and conditions—the boy is currently holding still (está quieto), but he isn't a statue. On the other hand, we use es with agónico because "agonizing" describes a fundamental characteristic of the problem itself, not just a passing physical state.
Is there a specific nuance to the word agónico here?