Breakdown of Auf dem alten Tisch ist schon ein kleiner Kratzer, aber meine Schwester stört das nicht.
Questions & Answers about Auf dem alten Tisch ist schon ein kleiner Kratzer, aber meine Schwester stört das nicht.
Why does the sentence start with Auf dem alten Tisch instead of the subject?
German often puts a location or time expression first for emphasis or simply for style. When that happens, the verb still has to stay in second position in the clause.
So:
- Auf dem alten Tisch = first element
- ist = second position
- schon ein kleiner Kratzer = the rest of the clause
This follows the normal German verb-second rule for main clauses.
A more neutral version would be:
- Schon ist ein kleiner Kratzer auf dem alten Tisch.
- Ein kleiner Kratzer ist schon auf dem alten Tisch.
All of these are possible, but the original puts focus on the table first.
Why is it auf dem alten Tisch and not auf den alten Tisch?
Because this phrase describes a location, not a movement.
German prepositions like auf can take either:
- dative for location: on the table
- accusative for movement toward a destination: onto the table
Here, the scratch already exists on the table, so the location is static:
- auf dem alten Tisch = on the old table
(dem = dative)
If it were movement, you would use accusative:
- Ich lege das Buch auf den alten Tisch. = I put the book onto the old table.
Why is it dem alten Tisch? What case is that?
What does schon mean here?
Here schon means something like already.
So ist schon ein kleiner Kratzer suggests that the scratch is already there, perhaps earlier than expected or unfortunately present now.
Depending on context, schon can also have other meanings in German, such as:
- reassurance: Das wird schon.
- emphasis: Das ist schon richtig.
- yes, but...: Schon, aber...
In this sentence, though, the natural meaning is already.
Why is it ein kleiner Kratzer? What case is that?
It is nominative singular, because ein kleiner Kratzer is the grammatical subject of the first clause.
The core structure is:
- Ein kleiner Kratzer ist auf dem alten Tisch.
Even though the sentence begins with Auf dem alten Tisch, the subject is still ein kleiner Kratzer.
Because Kratzer is masculine and singular, with ein in the nominative, you get:
- ein kleiner Kratzer
Is Kratzer the subject even though it comes after the verb?
Yes. In German, the subject does not always come first.
In the clause:
- Auf dem alten Tisch ist schon ein kleiner Kratzer
the subject is ein kleiner Kratzer, even though it appears after the verb.
German word order is more flexible than English. The key rule in a main clause is that the finite verb is in second position, not that the subject must come first.
Why is it meine Schwester stört das nicht and not das stört meine Schwester nicht?
Both are possible, but they mean slightly different things in terms of focus.
- Meine Schwester stört das nicht puts more focus on my sister
- Das stört meine Schwester nicht puts more focus on that
In the original, meine Schwester comes first because it is the topic of the second clause: we are now talking about her reaction.
Also notice that stören works differently from English to bother in terms of structure:
- Das stört meine Schwester nicht. = That does not bother my sister.
- literally: That disturbs my sister not
So das is the thing causing annoyance, and meine Schwester is the person affected.
How does the verb stören work grammatically?
Stören usually takes:
- the thing that bothers someone as the subject (nominative)
- the person bothered as the object (accusative)
So in a basic sentence:
- Das stört meine Schwester.
- literally: That bothers my sister.
Breakdown:
- das = subject, nominative
- meine Schwester = accusative object
In the original sentence:
- aber meine Schwester stört das nicht
the word order is changed, but the roles stay the same:
- das is still the subject
- meine Schwester is still the accusative object
A useful comparison:
- Ich störe meine Schwester. = I bother my sister.
- Meine Schwester stört mich. = My sister bothers me.
Why is there a das in the second clause?
Das refers back to the previous idea: namely, the fact that there is already a small scratch on the table.
So here das means something like:
- that
- that fact
- it, in a broad sense
German often uses das to refer to a whole situation or previous statement.
So:
- aber meine Schwester stört das nicht = but that doesn’t bother my sister
What does nicht negate here?
Here nicht negates the verb phrase stört das in the sense of does not bother.
So:
- meine Schwester stört das nicht means
- that does not bother my sister
In other words, the negation applies to the whole idea that this situation bothers her.
If you changed the position of nicht, the meaning or emphasis could change. In this sentence, the placement is natural and standard.
Why is the verb ist singular?
Because the subject is singular:
- ein kleiner Kratzer = a small scratch
Since Kratzer is singular, the verb must also be singular:
- ist
If the subject were plural, you would say:
- Auf dem alten Tisch sind schon kleine Kratzer. = There are already small scratches on the old table.
Is ist ... ein kleiner Kratzer like English there is a small scratch?
Yes, very much.
German often expresses existence simply with sein plus a noun phrase and a location:
- Auf dem alten Tisch ist schon ein kleiner Kratzer.
A natural English translation is:
- There is already a small scratch on the old table.
German does not need a dummy subject like English there in this kind of sentence.
Why is there no comma before und-type meaning in English, but there is one before aber in German?
Because aber introduces a new main clause, and in standard German spelling, clauses joined with coordinating conjunctions like aber are separated with a comma.
So:
- ..., aber meine Schwester stört das nicht.
This is normal German punctuation.
In English, punctuation rules are a bit different and more style-dependent, but in German this comma is standard.
Can schon sound emotional or suggest annoyance here?
Yes, it can.
Although schon literally means already, in context it can suggest something like:
- there’s already a small scratch
- there’s even already a small scratch
- unfortunately, there’s already a scratch
So it can carry a slight emotional coloring depending on tone and context. The speaker may be implying that the scratch is regrettable, surprising, or worth noticing.
What are the adjective endings in alten and kleiner doing?
They show case, gender, and article pattern.
1. dem alten Tisch
- dem = dative masculine singular
- after a definite article like dem, the adjective takes a weak ending
- so: alten
2. ein kleiner Kratzer
- ein = nominative masculine singular
- with ein-words, the adjective often has to carry more grammatical information
- so you get: kleiner
That is why the forms are:
- dem alten Tisch
- ein kleiner Kratzer
Could I say Auf dem alten Tisch gibt es schon einen kleinen Kratzer instead?
Yes, that is also correct.
- Auf dem alten Tisch ist schon ein kleiner Kratzer
- Auf dem alten Tisch gibt es schon einen kleinen Kratzer
Both can mean There is already a small scratch on the old table.
A small grammar difference:
- with ist, ein kleiner Kratzer is nominative
- with gibt es, einen kleinen Kratzer is accusative
So:
- ist schon ein kleiner Kratzer
- gibt es schon einen kleinen Kratzer
Both are natural, though ist may sound a little simpler and more direct here.
Could das be replaced by es?
Usually das is better here.
Why? Because das refers back to the whole previous situation: the scratch being there.
- Das stört meine Schwester nicht. = That doesn’t bother my sister.
Using es would be less natural if you want to point back clearly to the whole idea. Es usually works more like it, while das often points to a previously mentioned statement, event, or situation.
So in this sentence, das is the more idiomatic choice.
What is the basic word order of the second clause?
The underlying structure is:
- Das stört meine Schwester nicht.
This is:
- Das = subject
- stört = verb
- meine Schwester = object
- nicht = negation
In the actual sentence, meine Schwester is moved to the front for emphasis or topic:
- Meine Schwester stört das nicht.
Because it is still a main clause, the verb remains in second position:
- first element: meine Schwester
- second position: stört
So the sentence is correct even though the subject is not first.
How would a learner know that meine Schwester is accusative here?
There are two clues.
1. The verb stören
As a normal pattern, stören takes the affected person in the accusative:
- Das stört mich.
- Das stört ihn.
- Das stört meine Schwester.
2. Meaning and structure
What is doing the bothering? das.
Who is being bothered? meine Schwester.
With a feminine noun like Schwester, nominative and accusative look the same:
- meine Schwester can be nominative or accusative in form
So here you identify the case mostly through the verb pattern and meaning, not through the article form alone.
Could this sentence be translated literally into English word for word?
Not very naturally.
A very literal version would be something like:
- On the old table is already a small scratch, but my sister bothers that not.
That is understandable, but not natural English.
A natural English rendering would be:
- There is already a small scratch on the old table, but that doesn’t bother my sister.
This is a good example of how German and English often use different word order even when the meaning is the same.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning GermanMaster German — from Auf dem alten Tisch ist schon ein kleiner Kratzer, aber meine Schwester stört das nicht to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions