Wij staan bij de grens, maar wij hebben er niet lang moeten wachten.

Questions & Answers about Wij staan bij de grens, maar wij hebben er niet lang moeten wachten.

Why does the sentence use the infinitive moeten instead of a past participle like "gemoeten"?
This is the "double infinitive" rule for the perfect tense! When a modal verb like moeten (must/have to) is used alongside another verb (wachten), it doesn't change into a past participle. Instead, both verbs stay in their full infinitive form (moeten wachten) and move to the very end of the sentence.
Does the order of the two infinitives at the end matter?
Yes, it does. In a double infinitive, the modal verb (moeten) almost always comes before the main action verb (wachten). It mirrors the English order: we had to "must wait" (moeten wachten).
What is the word er doing in the second half of the sentence?
In this context, er means "there". It is a handy placeholder that refers back to the location you just mentioned—the border (de grens). This saves you from having to repeat the whole phrase "at the border".
Why doesn't the word maar push the verb hebben to the end of the sentence?
Maar (but) is a coordinating conjunction, just like en (and) or of (or). These connecting words link two independent sentences together without changing the word order in either of them. Because of this, the verb hebben stays in its normal second position, right after wij.

Learn Wij staan bij de grens, maar wij hebben er niet lang moeten wachten and more in Dutch

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free