Breakdown of El sirviente trajo un plato indigno. ¡Ni que me lo hubiera comido!
comer
to eat
un
a, an (masculine)
el plato
the dish / the plate
traer
to bring
que
that / than
me
to me / me (direct object)
lo
it / him (direct object)
haber
(auxiliary) have
ni
nor / not even
el sirviente
servant
indigno
unworthy
Questions & Answers about El sirviente trajo un plato indigno. ¡Ni que me lo hubiera comido!
Why do we use the past perfect subjunctive (hubiera comido) here instead of the imperfect subjunctive?
The phrase ¡ni que! always triggers the subjunctive because it introduces a strongly rejected or hypothetical reality. We use the past perfect subjunctive (hubiera comido) here because the rejected action (eating the dish) would have happened entirely in the past. If you wanted to reject a present or future idea (like "As if I would eat it!"), you would use the imperfect subjunctive (comiera).
Why is there a me in me lo hubiera comido?
This is an example of the verb comerse rather than just comer. In Spanish, adding a reflexive pronoun (like me for myself) to verbs of consumption emphasizes eating the whole thing, or eating it with gusto. Here, me pairs with the direct object lo (the dish) to add dramatic emphasis: "As if I had eaten it all up!"
How does ¡ni que! literally translate, and is it always used for this kind of tone?
Literally, it translates to something like "Not even that..." but in practice, it maps perfectly to the English "As if!" or "It's not like...". It is a set expression used specifically to express indignant rejection, disbelief, or sarcasm, so it always carries this defensive, dramatic tone.
Could I just say the dish was malo (bad) instead of indigno?
Learn El sirviente trajo un plato indigno. ¡Ni que me lo hubiera comido and more in Spanish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free