Nós não faríamos isso, nem que a ameaça fosse verdadeira.

Questions & Answers about Nós não faríamos isso, nem que a ameaça fosse verdadeira.

Why does nem que trigger the imperfect subjunctive (fosse) here rather than the present subjunctive?
The phrase nem que introduces an extreme, hypothetical condition. Because the main verb (faríamos) is in the conditional tense, the condition must match it in the past/hypothetical realm. We use fosse to show that the threat isn't actually true, but we are imagining a world where it was.
Can nem que ever be followed by the present subjunctive instead?
Yes, if the main clause is in the present or future tense. For example, if you said não faremos isso, nem que a ameaça seja verdadeira (we will not do that, even if the threat is true), you would use the present subjunctive (seja). Because our example sentence uses the conditional (faríamos), it forces the imperfect subjunctive (fosse).
Could I use mesmo se instead of nem que in this sentence?
Yes, you could use mesmo se, which also means 'even if' and pairs with the imperfect subjunctive here. However, nem que is more dramatic. Because the main clause is negative (não faríamos), using nem que acts like an emphatic 'not even if', making your refusal sound absolute.
I often hear native speakers use the imperfect indicative for hypotheticals. Could I say nós não fazíamos isso here?
Yes! In spoken, everyday Portuguese, it is extremely common to replace the conditional (faríamos) with the imperfect indicative (fazíamos). However, the sentence as written uses the formal conditional, which is the grammatical standard for writing and careful speech when setting up a hypothetical scenario.

Learn Nós não faríamos isso, nem que a ameaça fosse verdadeira and more in Portuguese

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free