Ho avuto un sospetto, ma l'uomo è entrato senza bussare e senza esitare.

Questions & Answers about Ho avuto un sospetto, ma l'uomo è entrato senza bussare e senza esitare.

Why does this sentence use the infinitive bussare instead of an "-ing" word for "knocking"?
In English, we say "without knocking," using the "-ing" form (gerund). In Italian, prepositions like senza (without) are followed by the infinitive form of the verb. This creates an implicit clause where the subject is understood to be the same as the main clause (the man).
Could I drop the second senza and just say senza bussare e esitare?
You technically could, but it sounds much better in Italian to repeat the preposition senza before each infinitive. Repeating it as senza bussare e senza esitare adds emphasis and makes the sentence flow more naturally.
Why do we switch from ho avuto to è entrato for the past tense?
This is a great reminder of how helper verbs work in the past tense! The verb avere (to have) takes itself as a helper verb (ho avuto). However, entrare (to enter) is a verb of movement, so it requires essere as its helper verb, which is why we see è entrato.
What is the difference between using avere un sospetto and the verb sospettare?
Both are perfectly fine! Sospettare means to suspect, while avere un sospetto means to have a suspicion. Using the noun phrase here emphasizes the sudden arrival of that specific feeling right before the man entered.

Learn Ho avuto un sospetto, ma l'uomo è entrato senza bussare e senza esitare and more in Italian

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free