No finjas que no me oyes cuando te hablo.

Because No finjas is a negative tú command, meaning Don’t pretend.

In Spanish, negative informal commands use:

• no + present subjunctive

So:

• finges = you pretend / you are pretending
• no finges = you don’t pretend
• no finjas = don’t pretend

That is why the sentence uses finjas, not finges.

It comes from the present subjunctive of fingir.

A useful way to form the subjunctive is:

1. Start with the yo form of the present tense
   
   • yo finjo
2. Remove the -o
   
   • finj-
3. Add the subjunctive ending for tú
   
   • -as
4. Result: finjas

So:

• fingir → finjo → finj- → finjas

The g changes to j because Spanish keeps the same strong consonant sound before a.

Because they are negating two different things.

• No finjas = Don’t pretend
• que no me oyes = that you don’t hear me

So the full idea is:

• Don’t pretend
  • that you don’t hear me

This is completely normal in Spanish. It is not accidental double negation; each no belongs to a different verb.

Because fingir que is the normal Spanish structure for to pretend that.

So:

• fingir que... = to pretend that...

Examples:

• Finge que está enfermo. = He pretends that he is ill.
• No finjas que no me oyes. = Don’t pretend that you can’t hear me.

Here que introduces the clause that says what the person is pretending.

Because after fingir que, Spanish normally uses the indicative, not the subjunctive.

Here the speaker is saying:

• Don’t pretend that you don’t hear me

So the clause after que is stated as the content of the pretence:

• que no me oyes

That is why oyes is used.

Compare:

• No finjas que no me oyes. = correct
• No finjas que no me oigas. = not the normal choice here

The subjunctive is already in finjas because of the negative command. The second verb does not also become subjunctive just because que is present.

Because oír and escuchar are related, but they are not exactly the same.

• oír = to hear
• escuchar = to listen

In this sentence, the idea is that the person is pretending not to hear the speaker, not necessarily refusing to listen attentively.

So:

• no me oyes = you don’t hear me
• no me escuchas = you don’t listen to me

Both could make sense in different situations, but oír fits this sentence very naturally.

They are object pronouns.

• me = me
• te = you / to you

In Spanish, these short object pronouns usually go before a conjugated verb.

So:

• no me oyes = you don’t hear me
• te hablo = I speak to you

A helpful way to see it is:

• oír a alguien → to hear someone
• hablar a alguien / hablarle a alguien → to speak to someone

So in the sentence:

• me is the person being heard
• te is the person being spoken to

Because cuando te hablo sounds like a general or repeated situation: when I speak to you.

The speaker means something like:

• Whenever I speak to you, don’t act as if you can’t hear me

Spanish often uses the present indicative after cuando for habitual or current situations.

• cuando te hablo = when I speak to you / when I’m speaking to you

If it were about a future, not-yet-happened moment, Spanish would often use the subjunctive:

• cuando te hable = when I speak to you in the future

So the choice depends on meaning:

• cuando te hablo = habitual / general
• cuando te hable = future

Yes. The formal version would be:

• No finja que no me oye cuando le hablo.

Changes:

• finjas → finja
• oyes → oye
• te → le

This is the usted version, used for formality, distance, or respect.

So:

• No finjas que no me oyes cuando te hablo. = informal tú
• No finja que no me oye cuando le hablo. = formal usted

Yes, it is natural in Spain.

The tone is fairly direct and mildly reproachful. It sounds like the speaker is annoyed because the other person is ignoring them.

It is not especially vulgar or rude, but it is definitely not neutral. It feels like a complaint or reprimand.

Depending on tone of voice, it could sound:

• irritated
• accusatory
• impatient

So it is grammatically ordinary, but emotionally quite pointed.

Yes, a little.

The original order is very natural:

• No finjas que no me oyes cuando te hablo.

But Spanish can move the time clause for emphasis:

• Cuando te hablo, no finjas que no me oyes.

Both are correct. The meaning stays basically the same, but the emphasis changes:

• original order: stronger focus on don’t pretend
• fronted cuando te hablo: stronger focus on when I’m talking to you

The pronouns me and te, however, normally stay before the conjugated verbs in this sentence.

Yes. It comes from the verb oír, which is irregular.

Present tense of oír:

• yo oigo
• tú oyes
• él/ella/usted oye
• nosotros oímos
• vosotros oís
• ellos/ellas/ustedes oyen

So oyes is not formed in a completely regular way. The y appears in several forms of oír.

That is why the sentence has:

• no me oyes
  not
• no me oes