Breakdown of זאת עובדה שהוא תמיד מגיע בזמן, אבל אני לא יודעת אם זה רלוונטי לשיחה הזאת.
Questions & Answers about זאת עובדה שהוא תמיד מגיע בזמן, אבל אני לא יודעת אם זה רלוונטי לשיחה הזאת.
Why does the sentence start with זאת עובדה and not זה עובדה?
Because עובדה is a feminine noun, and זאת is the feminine form of this/that when used on its own.
- זאת עובדה = That/This is a fact
- זה ספר = This/That is a book (masculine noun)
In modern Hebrew, זאת and זו are both common feminine forms here.
What exactly does זאת עובדה mean grammatically?
Literally, it means That is a fact or This is a fact.
Hebrew often uses a very direct structure:
- זאת = this/that
- עובדה = fact
So the sentence begins by stating something firmly: It’s a fact that...
What does שהוא mean here?
שהוא is made of two parts:
- ש־ = that
- הוא = he
So שהוא תמיד מגיע בזמן means that he always arrives on time.
This is a very common Hebrew structure:
- אני יודע שהוא כאן = I know that he is here
- ברור שהיא צודקת = It’s clear that she is right
Why is ש־ attached directly to הוא?
In Hebrew, the word ש־ (that) is often written as a prefix attached to the following word.
So instead of writing a separate word, Hebrew commonly does this:
- שהוא = that he is
- שאני = that I
- שזה = that it/this is
This is normal and very common in everyday Hebrew.
Why does it say מגיע בזמן instead of a form of to be?
Because the idea is he arrives on time, not he is on time in a static sense.
- מגיע comes from להגיע = to arrive
- בזמן = on time
So הוא תמיד מגיע בזמן literally means he always arrives on time.
In English, he is always on time and he always arrives on time are very close in meaning, but Hebrew often uses מגיע בזמן for this idea.
What does בזמן mean exactly?
בזמן means on time.
It is made of:
- ב־ = in / at / on
- זמן = time
Together, in this expression, it means on time.
Examples:
- אני רוצה להגיע בזמן = I want to arrive on time
- הוא אף פעם לא מגיע בזמן = He never arrives on time
Why is it אני לא יודעת and not אני לא יודע?
Because יודעת is the feminine singular form, so the speaker is female.
- אני לא יודע = said by a male speaker
- אני לא יודעת = said by a female speaker
Hebrew verbs in the present tense agree with gender in the singular.
Why is אם used here? Doesn’t it mean if?
Yes, אם can mean if, but it also often means whether.
So here:
- אני לא יודעת אם זה רלוונטי = I don’t know whether it is relevant
English also sometimes uses if this way:
- I don’t know if it’s relevant
- I don’t know whether it’s relevant
So this is a very natural Hebrew use of אם.
What is the role of זה in אם זה רלוונטי?
Here זה means it / this.
So:
- אם זה רלוונטי = whether it is relevant
Hebrew often uses זה in a broad, general way, much like English it in sentences such as I don’t know if it’s important.
Why is it רלוונטי and not a feminine form?
Because רלוונטי agrees with זה, which is treated as masculine singular.
- זה רלוונטי = it is relevant (masculine singular form)
- זו רלוונטית = this is relevant referring to a feminine noun
Since the sentence says אם זה רלוונטי, the adjective stays masculine singular.
What does לשיחה mean, and why is the ל־ attached?
לשיחה means to the conversation or for the conversation depending on context.
It is built from:
- ל־ = to / for
- שיחה = conversation
Because שיחה is definite here (the conversation), the ה of הַשיחה combines with the prefix ל־:
- ל + השיחה → לשיחה
This kind of contraction is very common in Hebrew:
- לבית = to the house
- לילד = to the boy
Why does Hebrew say השיחה הזאת and not put הזאת before the noun?
In Hebrew, demonstratives like הזה / הזאת / האלה usually come after the noun.
So:
- השיחה הזאת = this conversation
- הספר הזה = this book
- הילדה הזאת = this girl
This is different from English, where this comes before the noun.
Why does שיחה have both ה־ and הזאת? Isn’t that like saying the this conversation?
It may feel redundant from an English perspective, but in Hebrew this is the normal pattern.
To say this conversation, Hebrew usually uses:
- השיחה הזאת
Both parts are expected:
- ה־ marks the noun as definite
- הזאת means this
The same thing happens in:
- הספר הזה = this book
- האנשים האלה = these people
Can זאת and הזאת both mean this/that? What’s the difference?
Yes, but they are used differently.
- זאת can stand alone: זאת עובדה = That/This is a fact
- הזאת follows a noun: השיחה הזאת = this conversation
So the difference is mostly grammatical:
- standalone form: זאת
- noun modifier after a feminine noun: הזאת
Why is there a comma before אבל?
Because אבל means but, and it joins two full clauses:
- זאת עובדה שהוא תמיד מגיע בזמן
- אבל אני לא יודעת אם זה רלוונטי לשיחה הזאת
Just like in English, a comma before but is very natural here.
Is the word order natural Hebrew, or could it be said differently?
Yes, this is very natural Hebrew.
The structure is:
- statement: זאת עובדה...
- contrast: אבל...
- uncertainty/opinion: אני לא יודעת אם...
A Hebrew speaker might also say similar versions, such as:
- זה שהוא תמיד מגיע בזמן זה עובדה, אבל אני לא יודעת אם זה רלוונטי לשיחה הזאת.
- נכון שהוא תמיד מגיע בזמן, אבל אני לא יודעת אם זה רלוונטי לשיחה הזאת.
But the original sentence is completely normal and natural.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning HebrewMaster Hebrew — from זאת עובדה שהוא תמיד מגיע בזמן, אבל אני לא יודעת אם זה רלוונטי לשיחה הזאת to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions