Breakdown of Anlaşılan o ki, anlattığı hikâyedeki tutarsızlıklar gerçeklerle çelişiyor.
o
that / he / she / it
hikâye
story
anlatmak
to explain, to tell
ile
with / by / and (linking nouns)
Questions & Answers about Anlaşılan o ki, anlattığı hikâyedeki tutarsızlıklar gerçeklerle çelişiyor.
How does the phrase Anlaşılan o ki break down, and how does it fit the lesson's topic?
Anlaşılan is the passive verb anlaşılmak (to be understood) turned into a noun using the -an participle. Literally, it means "the thing being understood." Together with o ki ("is that"), the whole phrase Anlaşılan o ki acts as an evidential cleft meaning "It is understood that..." or "It seems that...". It frames the rest of the sentence as a conclusion drawn from evidence.
Why do we use anlattığı instead of anlatan for "the story he told"?
We use the -dık participle (with a possessive suffix, becoming -tığı here) because the subject of the relative clause ("he") is different from the noun being modified (hikâye, the "story"). He is doing the telling, so the story is the object of his action. If we used the subject participle anlatan, anlatan hikâye would mean "the story that tells."
What are the suffixes attached to the word tutarsızlıklar?
It is built from the aorist verb form tutar (consistent, or "it holds"). Adding the negative suffix -sız creates the adjective tutarsız (inconsistent). The suffix -lık turns it into an abstract noun, tutarsızlık (inconsistency), and finally -lar makes it plural.
Why does gerçeklerle have the (with) suffix when the English translation is just "contradict the facts"?