Breakdown of Me sorprendió que el guiso estuviera tan picante como para que le doliera el paladar.
estar
to be (location/state)
para
for
que
that / than
me
to me / me (direct object)
le
to him / to her / to you (formal)
doler
to hurt / to ache
tan
as / so
como
as / like (such as, similar to)
sorprender
to surprise
picante
spicy
el paladar
the palate
el guiso
the stew
Questions & Answers about Me sorprendió que el guiso estuviera tan picante como para que le doliera el paladar.
Why do we use como para que here instead of just como para?
We use como para que instead of como para because there is a change of subject. The first part of the phrase is about the stew (el guiso), but the second part has a new subject: his palate (el paladar). When the subject changes in this structure, we must add que and use a conjugated verb in the subjunctive.
Why is doliera in the imperfect subjunctive?
Why is the first verb, estuviera, also in the subjunctive?
The verb estuviera is triggered by the phrase Me sorprendió que. In Spanish, expressing an emotional reaction to an event always triggers the subjunctive in the clause that describes what happened.
Why is estar (estuviera) used here instead of ser to describe the stew?
Why does the sentence say le doliera el paladar instead of doliera su paladar?
In Spanish, we usually avoid possessive adjectives like su with body parts. Instead, we use the definite article (el paladar) and an indirect object pronoun (le) to show whose body part it is. The verb doler functions like gustar: the palate is the grammatical subject that is causing the pain to him.
Learn Me sorprendió que el guiso estuviera tan picante como para que le doliera el paladar and more in Spanish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free