Por poco no llegamos a tiempo al cine, aunque el trayecto era de solo diez minutos.

Questions & Answers about Por poco no llegamos a tiempo al cine, aunque el trayecto era de solo diez minutos.

Why is it por poco no llegamos? It looks like it says we almost didn’t arrive, with a no in it.

Yes — that is exactly the idea.

Por poco means almost / nearly. In this sentence, por poco no llegamos a tiempo means we almost didn’t make it on time.

This structure can feel strange to English speakers because Spanish often uses:

  • por poco no + verb = almost not...
  • por poco + verb can also appear in some contexts, but por poco no makes the negative idea very clear here.

So:

  • Por poco no llegamos a tiempo = We almost didn’t arrive on time / We nearly failed to get there on time

The no is not a mistake; it is part of the meaning.

Why is llegamos in the preterite, not llegábamos?

Because the sentence refers to a specific completed situation in the past.

  • llegamos = we arrived / we made it in a completed event
  • llegábamos = we were arriving / used to arrive / would arrive, which would sound more ongoing or habitual

Here, the speaker is talking about one particular occasion when they almost didn’t get to the cinema on time. That is why llegamos is the natural choice.

Why is it era in el trayecto era de solo diez minutos, instead of fue?

Because era gives background information or describes a circumstance.

The sentence has two parts:

  1. Por poco no llegamos a tiempo al cine
    → the main event

  2. aunque el trayecto era de solo diez minutos
    → background description explaining the surprising context

Using era suggests the journey was only ten minutes long as a general fact about that trip. It is descriptive, not the main event.

If you used fue, it would sound more like presenting that duration as a completed fact in a more event-like way. Possible in some contexts, but era is the more natural choice here.

What does a tiempo mean exactly? Is it on time or in time?

Usually, a tiempo means on time or in time, depending on context.

In this sentence, llegar a tiempo means:

  • to arrive on time
  • or to make it in time

So no llegamos a tiempo al cine means they almost failed to arrive by the necessary time.

This is a very common expression:

  • Llegué a tiempo = I arrived on time / I made it in time
  • No llegamos a tiempo = We didn’t get there in time
Why is it al cine and not a el cine?

Because a + el contracts to al.

So:

  • a + el cineal cine

This contraction is mandatory in standard Spanish.

Examples:

  • Voy al supermercado
  • Llegamos al cine
  • Entró al hotel

The only common exception is when el is part of a proper name:

  • Voy a El Escorial
    not al Escorial
Why is there no subject pronoun like nosotros?

Because Spanish usually omits subject pronouns when the verb already shows who the subject is.

Here, llegamos clearly means we arrived / we got there, so nosotros is unnecessary.

Spanish often sounds more natural without the pronoun unless you want emphasis or contrast.

Compare:

  • Llegamos a tiempo = normal, natural
  • Nosotros llegamos a tiempo = we arrived on time, perhaps contrasting with someone else
What does trayecto mean here? Is it the same as viaje?

Trayecto means journey, trip, or route, especially the movement from one place to another.

In this sentence, el trayecto era de solo diez minutos means the trip itself took only ten minutes.

It is similar to viaje, but there is a nuance:

  • trayecto often focuses on the distance/route from A to B
  • viaje can sound broader, like a trip in general, sometimes longer or more substantial

Here, trayecto fits well because the speaker is talking about a short trip to the cinema.

Why is it de solo diez minutos? What is the de doing?

Here, ser de + duration/size/material/etc. is a common structure.

So:

  • era de diez minutos = it was ten minutes long / it lasted ten minutes

The de links the thing being described to a measurement or characteristic.

Examples:

  • La película es de dos horas = The film is two hours long
  • La reunión fue de media hora = The meeting lasted half an hour
  • El trayecto era de solo diez minutos = The journey was only ten minutes long
Why is solo written without an accent?

Because in current standard Spanish, solo is usually written without an accent, even when it means only.

So:

  • solo = only
  • solo can also mean alone, but context usually makes the meaning clear

In older spelling, some people wrote sólo for only to distinguish it from solo = alone. Today, the Royal Spanish Academy generally recommends solo without the accent in normal cases.

Here, de solo diez minutos clearly means of only ten minutes, so no accent is needed.

Why is aunque followed by the indicative here, not the subjunctive?

Because the speaker is referring to a real, known fact.

  • aunque + indicative = although / even though, when the speaker presents the information as true
  • aunque + subjunctive = often used when the information is uncertain, hypothetical, or not being presented as an established fact

Here, el trayecto era de solo diez minutos is presented as a real fact, so era in the indicative is correct.

Compare:

  • Aunque llovía, salimos = Although it was raining, we went out
    → real fact

  • Aunque llueva, saldremos = Even if it rains, we’ll go out
    → possibility/future condition

Could aunque be translated as although or even though here?

Yes. In this sentence, both work well.

  • aunque = although
  • aunque = even though

Because the second part gives a surprising contrast, even though is often the most natural translation in English:

  • We almost didn’t make it to the cinema on time, even though the journey was only ten minutes.
Is llegar al cine literally arrive to the cinema?

In Spanish, yes, llegar a is the normal structure, so llegar al cine literally corresponds to arrive at the cinema.

In English, we usually say:

  • arrive at the cinema
  • get to the cinema
  • make it to the cinema

So Spanish uses a, while English usually uses at after arrive.

Why is there a comma before aunque?

Because aunque el trayecto era de solo diez minutos is an added contrasting clause.

The comma helps separate:

  • the main idea: Por poco no llegamos a tiempo al cine
  • the contrasting background: aunque el trayecto era de solo diez minutos

This punctuation is very natural here, especially in writing, because the second clause comments on or contrasts with the first.

Could you say Por poco no llegamos al cine a tiempo instead?

Yes, that is also grammatical.

Both are possible:

  • llegamos a tiempo al cine
  • llegamos al cine a tiempo

The meaning stays the same: we arrived at the cinema on time.

The original version places a tiempo before al cine, which keeps the focus slightly more on being on time. Spanish word order is often flexible, especially with adverbial phrases like this.

Is this sentence natural in Spain?

Yes, it sounds natural in Spain.

Features that are perfectly normal in Peninsular Spanish include:

A speaker in Spain would understand it immediately as something like: We nearly didn’t make it to the cinema on time, even though it was only a ten-minute trip.

AI Language TutorTry it ↗
Your avatar
What's the best way to learn Spanish grammar?
Spanish grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Spanish

Master Spanish — from Por poco no llegamos a tiempo al cine, aunque el trayecto era de solo diez minutos to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • AI tutor to answer your grammar questions