אחרי שאני ממלאת את הטופס, אני חותמת על המסמך ונותנת אותו לפקידה.

Because the speaker is female singular.

In Hebrew present tense, verbs agree with the subject in gender and number:

• ממלאת = a woman says I fill out / I am filling out
• חותמת = a woman says I sign / I am signing
• נותנת = a woman says I give / I am giving

If the speaker were male, the forms would be:

• ממלא
• חותם
• נותן

So this sentence is being said by a woman.

It would be:

אחרי שאני ממלא את הטופס, אני חותם על המסמך ונותן אותו לפקידה.

The only changes are the present-tense verb forms:

• ממלאת → ממלא
• חותמת → חותם
• נותנת → נותן

Everything else stays the same.

Because Hebrew usually uses אחרי ש־... to mean after (someone) does....

So:

• אחרי = after
• ש = that / which / introducing a clause
• אני = I

Together, אחרי שאני ממלאת את הטופס means after I fill out the form.

A useful contrast:

• אחרי הטופס = after the form
• אחרי שאני ממלאת את הטופס = after I fill out the form

So שאני is needed because a whole clause follows, not just a noun.

Hebrew often uses the present tense for:

• habitual actions
• instructions
• describing a usual sequence

So this sentence can naturally mean something like:

• After I fill out the form, I sign the document and give it to the clerk
• or After filling out the form, I then sign the document and give it to the clerk

If you wanted a clearly future, one-time meaning, Hebrew would often use future forms instead:

אחרי שאמלא את הטופס, אחתום על המסמך ואתן אותו לפקידה.

So the present tense here is normal and natural.

Here, את is the direct object marker. It does not mean you in this sentence.

Hebrew uses את before a definite direct object, usually one with ה־ (the).

So:

• הטופס = the form
• את הטופס = marks the form as the direct object

That is why you get:

• ממלאת את הטופס = fill out the form

But you do not translate את into English.

Because הטופס is the direct object of ממלאת, but המסמך comes after the preposition על.

Compare:

• ממלאת את הטופס
  The form is the direct object, so Hebrew uses את.

• חותמת על המסמך
  Here המסמך is part of the prepositional phrase על המסמך = on the document, so there is no direct object marker.

So את only appears before a definite direct object, not after prepositions like על, ל, ב, etc.

Because the Hebrew verb לחתום normally goes with על when talking about signing a document.

So Hebrew says:

• לחתום על מסמך = to sign a document

Literally, it is closer to sign on the document than sign the document, even though in English we usually just say sign the document.

This is just the normal Hebrew pattern, and it is something learners need to memorize with the verb.

אותו is the Hebrew direct object pronoun meaning him or it for a masculine singular noun.

Here it refers to המסמך (the document), which is grammatically masculine.

So:

• המסמך = masculine singular
• אותו = it referring to a masculine singular noun

If the noun were feminine, Hebrew would use אותה instead.

For example:

• הבקשה = the request (feminine)
• נותנת אותה = gives it

Because ל־ means to, and the verb לתת (to give) often takes:

• a direct object: אותו = it
• an indirect object with ל־: לפקידה = to the clerk

So:

• נותנת אותו לפקידה = gives it to the clerk

Also:

• פקיד = male clerk
• פקידה = female clerk

Since the sentence says לפקידה, the clerk is female.

Sometimes yes, but here keeping it is very natural.

Hebrew present tense does not show person clearly. For example:

• חותמת could mean I sign, you sign (to a woman), or she signs

Because of that, Hebrew often keeps pronouns like אני for clarity.

So:

• אני חותמת = clearly I sign
• חותמת by itself could be ambiguous

In this sentence, repeating אני after the comma sounds normal and clear.

Yes, it often can be, especially in natural speech:

אחרי שאני ממלאת את הטופס, חותמת על המסמך ונותנת אותו לפקידה.

This is understandable, because the subject is still clearly the same person.

Still, many speakers would keep the second אני because:

• it sounds a bit clearer
• present-tense forms can be ambiguous
• it helps mark the next part of the sequence

So both are possible, but the version with the second אני is perfectly normal.

The sentence has two main parts:

1. אחרי שאני ממלאת את הטופס
   = a time clause: After I fill out the form

2. אני חותמת על המסמך ונותנת אותו לפקידה
   = the main clause: I sign the document and give it to the clerk

Inside the main clause, the order is basically:

• subject: אני
• verb: חותמת
• prepositional phrase: על המסמך
• second verb: ונותנת
• object pronoun: אותו
• indirect object: לפקידה

So the structure is very typical Hebrew word order.

Yes, נתן is a very common verb that can look a little tricky.

The dictionary form is:

• נתן = he gave / to give

But in the present tense, the forms are:

• נותן = giving / gives (masculine singular)
• נותנת = giving / gives (feminine singular)

So the ו in נותנת is part of the normal present-tense pattern for this verb.

This is one of those very common verbs that learners simply get used to through repetition:

• אני נותן / נותנת
• הוא נותן
• היא נותנת

So even if it looks less predictable at first, it is completely standard.