Question 1

How would we add a second condition like "and even if it is free" using this lesson's rule?

Accepted Answer

Instead of repeating même si, you can use que to introduce the second clause. But there is a major trap here: while même si takes the indicative, a que replacing it must be followed by the subjunctive! So you would write: Même si la nature semble inépuisable et qu'elle soit gratuite...

Question 2

Why is semble in the indicative? Doesn't même si trigger the subjunctive?

Accepted Answer

It is a very common trap, but même si always takes the indicative. Even though it expresses a hypothesis or concession, it behaves just like a regular si clause. You only need the subjunctive for similar phrases like bien que or, as mentioned above, when using que to avoid repeating même si.

Question 3

Why do we use il est idiot de rather than c'est idiot de?

Accepted Answer

Il est is the standard, grammatically formal way to build an impersonal expression (where "it" doesn't refer to a specific noun). You will absolutely hear c'est idiot de gaspiller in everyday spoken French, but il est idiot is considered more correct and elegant for written French.

Question 4

Why is the preposition de required before gaspiller?

Accepted Answer

The impersonal structure il est + adjective always requires the preposition de before the infinitive verb that follows it. It serves as the grammatical bridge between describing the action as idiot and the action itself (gaspiller).

Même si la nature semble inépuisable, il est idiot de gaspiller l'énergie.

Breakdown of Même si la nature semble inépuisable, il est idiot de gaspiller l'énergie.

Questions & Answers about Même si la nature semble inépuisable, il est idiot de gaspiller l'énergie.

Learn Même si la nature semble inépuisable, il est idiot de gaspiller l'énergie and more in French