Breakdown of پروردگارا، دلاوری برای ما بفرست که بتواند اهریمن را شکست دهد.
ما
we
برایbarâye
for
راrâ
definite direct object marker
فرستادنferestâdan
to send
Questions & Answers about پروردگارا، دلاوری برای ما بفرست که بتواند اهریمن را شکست دهد.
How does parvardegârâ translate to "O Lord" when the word ey isn't used?
It uses the literary vocative suffix -â attached directly to the noun parvardegâr (Lord or Creator). This suffix is heavily used in poetry, prayers, and classical literature to directly address someone or something, replacing or sometimes reinforcing the pre-nominal particle ey.
Why is betavânad (can) in the subjunctive mood here?
The verb betavânad is part of a relative clause starting with ke (who/that) which describes an indefinite noun, delâvari (a brave warrior). Because the speaker is asking for a warrior who hypothetically fits this description, rather than stating a known fact about a specific person who already exists, the subjunctive mood is required.
Why is shekast dahad (defeat) also in the subjunctive mood?
In Farsi, modal verbs like can (tavânestan), must (bâyad), and want (khâstan) require the main action verb that follows them to be in the subjunctive. Since betavânad means "he can", the following compound verb shekast dâdan (to defeat) must take the subjunctive form shekast dahad.
Why does ahriman get the object marker râ, but the other object, delâvari, doesn't?
The object marker râ is strictly used for definite direct objects. The word delâvari has the indefinite suffix -i, meaning "a" warrior, so it cannot take . Conversely, (the demon or the devil in ancient Persian mythology) refers to a specific, known entity, making it definite and requiring .