Word
Ze zouden een lichtgevend voorwerp op de radar hebben gezien.
Meaning
They allegedly saw a luminous object on the radar.
Part of speech
sentence
Pronunciation
Course
Breakdown of Ze zouden een lichtgevend voorwerp op de radar hebben gezien.
een
a/an
hebben
to have
zien
to see
op
on
Questions & Answers about Ze zouden een lichtgevend voorwerp op de radar hebben gezien.
Why does zouden mean 'allegedly' here instead of 'would'?
In Dutch, zouden is often used for evidential modality, meaning it reports hearsay or a claim you cannot personally verify. It acts like 'supposedly', 'allegedly', or 'is said to' in English. The speaker is reporting what someone else claims to have seen on the radar without confirming it as an absolute fact.
How does the grammar show that this alleged event happened in the past?
The past timeframe is created by combining zouden with the perfect infinitive hebben gezien (to have seen). While the literal word-for-word translation is 'They would have seen', the evidential meaning of zouden turns the phrase into 'They allegedly saw'.
How is the adjective lichtgevend formed?
It is a combination of the noun licht (light) and gevend (giving). Gevend is the present participle of the verb geven. Dutch frequently combines a noun and a present participle to create descriptive adjectives like this to mean 'light-emitting' or 'luminous'.
Can I swap the order of the verbs at the end to gezien hebben?
Yes! At the end of a Dutch clause, the auxiliary verb (hebben) and the past participle (gezien) form a verbal cluster. You are free to put them in either order, so both hebben gezien and gezien hebben are completely correct and natural.