Nitko ne bi pronašao netaknut kostur da nismo imali sreće.

Questions & Answers about Nitko ne bi pronašao netaknut kostur da nismo imali sreće.

Why do we use the standard past tense in da nismo imali for 'if we had not had'?
To make a past counterfactual 'if' clause (talking about something that didn't happen in the past), Croatian uses the word da followed by the regular past tense (Perfekt). Unlike English, which requires the past perfect ('had not had'), Croatian simply uses the standard past form nismo imali.
Why is there a ne before bi if the sentence already starts with Nitko (Nobody)?
Croatian requires double negation. Whenever you use a negative pronoun like Nitko (nobody) or ništa (nothing), the verb must also be negative. That is why we say Nitko ne bi pronašao (literally 'Nobody wouldn't find') instead of just Nitko bi pronašao.
Since netaknut kostur (an intact skeleton) is the object being found, why doesn't its ending change in the accusative case?
Both netaknut and kostur are masculine. In Croatian, inanimate masculine nouns (objects that aren't alive) have an accusative form that looks exactly like the nominative (dictionary) form. If the object were alive, the ending would change.
Why is it sreće instead of the accusative sreću after the verb 'to have'?
The phrase imati sreće (to be lucky / to have luck) traditionally uses the partitive genitive case. The genitive ending -e on sreća gives the meaning of having 'some amount of luck', which is the standard fixed way to express being lucky in Croatian.

Learn Nitko ne bi pronašao netaknut kostur da nismo imali sreće and more in Croatian

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free