Learn Turkish: Biz şirketimize böyle bir hatayı hiç yakıştırır mıyız? - Would we ever consider such a mistake fitting for our company?

This is a classic rhetorical question using the aorist tense. By combining hiç (which means 'ever' in positive questions) with a positive aorist question (yakıştırır mıyız? - 'would we consider fitting?'), the speaker expects an obvious 'No!' The result is actually a stronger, more emotional denial than if they had just used a standard negative sentence like Biz hiç yakıştırmayız (We never consider it fitting).

How is the verb yakıştırır mıyız built, and what is its root?

The root is yakışmak, which means 'to suit' or 'to look good on'. The -tır is the causative suffix, turning it into yakıştırmak, meaning 'to make something suit' or 'to consider something fitting/appropriate'. Finally, -ır is the positive aorist tense suffix, followed by the first-person plural question particle mı yız.

Why does this sentence use both the dative case (şirketimize) and the accusative case (hatayı)?

The verb yakıştırmak needs two objects to express its full meaning: you consider something fitting for someone/something. The thing being judged takes the accusative case (hatayı - the mistake), and the target it is being judged against takes the dative case (şirketimize - to our company).

Does böyle bir always have to stay together in that order?