Breakdown of Lo que me has dicho es muy ambiguo, o sea, podemos interpretarlo mal.
ser
to be
muy
very
poder
to be able to
me
to me / myself (reflexive) / me (direct object)
lo
it / him (m)
decir
to say / to tell
mal
badly / not well
haber
to have (auxiliary)
lo que
what (that which)
interpretar
to interpret
o sea
in other words
ambiguo
ambiguous
Questions & Answers about Lo que me has dicho es muy ambiguo, o sea, podemos interpretarlo mal.
Why use o sea here to connect the two phrases?
O sea is a clarifying connector that translates to "in other words" or "that is to say." Here, it takes the first idea (es muy ambiguo) and spells out its practical consequence (podemos interpretarlo mal). It signals to the listener that the second part is meant to clarify or explain the implications of the first part.
Why does the sentence start with Lo que instead of Qué?
Could the lo in interpretarlo go somewhere else?
Yes! When you have a conjugated verb followed by an infinitive (like podemos interpretar), the object pronoun (lo) can either attach to the end of the infinitive, as it does here (podemos interpretarlo), or it can go right before the conjugated verb (lo podemos interpretar). Both options are correct and mean the exact same thing.
Why is has dicho (present perfect) used here instead of dijiste (simple past)?
In Spain, the present perfect is the natural choice for past actions that feel very recent or are still highly relevant to the present moment. Because the speaker is currently evaluating how ambiguous the statement is, the action of you telling them this is still strongly connected to the present conversation.
Learn Lo que me has dicho es muy ambiguo, o sea, podemos interpretarlo mal and more in Spanish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free