Question 1

Why is llegaba in the imperfect indicative rather than the imperfect subjunctive? Doesn't a hypothetical hurricane imply doubt?

Accepted Answer

It does imply uncertainty, but the phrase por si (just in case) is a strict exception to the usual subjunctive rules. It is almost always followed by the indicative in everyday Spanish. Because the main action (almacenó) is in the past, we use the imperfect indicative (llegaba) to talk about the hypothetical past condition. If you used en caso de que instead of por si, you would then need the imperfect subjunctive (llegara).

Question 2

Could I use the conditional tense llegaría after por si in this sentence?

Accepted Answer

No, por si cannot be followed by the conditional tense. When talking about a "just in case" scenario that was possible in the past, you must stick to the imperfect indicative (llegaba).

Question 3

Why is the subject el huracán placed after the verb llegaba?

Accepted Answer

In Spanish, it is very common and natural to put the subject after the verb when the verb is about arriving, appearing, or entering (like llegar, aparecer, or entrar). You could grammatically say por si el huracán llegaba, but por si llegaba el huracán flows much better to native ears.

Question 4

Why do we use the preterite for almacenó but the imperfect for llegaba?

Accepted Answer

Almacenó (stored) is in the preterite because the act of carefully putting away the rations was a completed, specific action in the past. Llegaba (arrived / was arriving) uses the imperfect because it describes the background context: the looming, ongoing possibility of the hurricane during the time he was storing the food.

Él almacenó cuidadosamente las raciones por si llegaba el huracán.

Breakdown of Él almacenó cuidadosamente las raciones por si llegaba el huracán.

Questions & Answers about Él almacenó cuidadosamente las raciones por si llegaba el huracán.

Learn Él almacenó cuidadosamente las raciones por si llegaba el huracán and more in Spanish