Breakdown of Es la bestia la que come como si fuera un ogro.
ser
to be
comer
to eat
un
a, an (masculine)
que
that / than
Questions & Answers about Es la bestia la que come como si fuera un ogro.
Why do we use the past subjunctive fuera when the rest of the sentence is in the present tense (es, come)?
The phrase como si (as if) always requires a past subjunctive (like the imperfect subjunctive fuera) to describe hypothetical situations happening in the present. Even though the beast is currently eating, it isn't actually an ogre, so the comparison is contrary to reality.
Why is it la que instead of just que after la bestia?
This is a cleft sentence, a structure used to add emphasis. By saying Es la bestia la que come (literally, It is the beast the one that eats), we emphasize that the beast is the one eating, rather than someone else. While Es la bestia que come is understood, using the definite article plus que is the standard way to form this emphatic structure in Spanish.
Why use fuera (from ser) instead of estuviera (from estar) here?
You need the verb ser because you are equating the subject with a noun (un ogro). Ser is used for identity and defining what something is, whereas estar is used for temporary conditions or states. If the sentence were describing a state, like as if it were angry, you would use estar (como si estuviera enojado).
Is there another way to conjugate in this sentence?