Esa escultura fue hecha en esa época.

Questions & Answers about Esa escultura fue hecha en esa época.

Why use fue instead of estuvo or estaba here?
This sentence uses the passive voice to focus on the action that happened to the sculpture. To form this, you use ser (in the past tense, fue) plus the past participle (hecha). If you used a form of estar, you would be describing a state or condition rather than the action of it being created.
Why does the sentence use hecha instead of the standard past participle hecho?
When you use a past participle with ser to form the passive voice, it acts like an adjective. This means it must match the subject in both gender and number. Since escultura is a feminine, singular noun, the participle changes to hecha.
Since esa época (that era) is a long period of time, why use the preterite fue instead of the imperfect era?
Even though an era lasts a long time, the creation of the sculpture was a single, completed event. The preterite fue highlights the specific, finished action of it being made. If you used era, it would sound like the sculpture was constantly being made over and over again throughout the whole era.
Could I use the se passive here instead?
Yes! You could say Esa escultura se hizo en esa época. In everyday spoken Latin American Spanish, the passive with se is actually more common than the structure used here (fue hecha). However, both are perfectly correct, and fue hecha is very common in writing or historical contexts.

Learn Esa escultura fue hecha en esa época and more in Spanish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free