Question 1

Why do we use foi (preterite) instead of era (imperfect) when describing the attack?

Accepted Answer

Because the speaker is summarizing a completed event with a clear beginning and end (the game). We use the preterite (foi) for an overall summary judgment of a finished event. Using era would sound like an ongoing background description rather than a final verdict on how the match went.

Question 2

Would bastante become plural if we were talking about multiple attacks?

Accepted Answer

Not in this case! Here, bastante is acting as an adverb meaning quite or rather, modifying the adjective agressivo. Adverbs do not change form. It would only become plural (bastantes) if it were acting as an adjective meaning enough or plenty of directly modifying a noun.

Question 3

Why use neste rather than nesse if the game is already in the past?

Accepted Answer

While nesse is indeed the standard choice for past events, using neste (a contraction of em + este) shows that the speaker feels a close temporal or psychological connection to the game. It implies the match just finished very recently or they are actively reviewing it right now.

Question 4

Is the definite article o mandatory before nosso ataque?

Accepted Answer

Yes, in European Portuguese it is standard and generally required to use the definite article before a possessive pronoun, such as o nosso ataque. Dropping it is typical of Brazilian Portuguese, whereas in Portugal it is only omitted in specific cases like with certain family members or in very formal writing.

O nosso ataque neste jogo foi bastante agressivo.

Breakdown of O nosso ataque neste jogo foi bastante agressivo.

Questions & Answers about O nosso ataque neste jogo foi bastante agressivo.

Learn O nosso ataque neste jogo foi bastante agressivo and more in Portuguese