Question 1

Why do we use havia here instead of houve?

Accepted Answer

The word antigamente (formerly / in the past) sets the scene for a continuous, ongoing state rather than a single completed event. When describing how things used to be or what generally existed over an indefinite period of time, we use the imperfect tense havia instead of the simple past houve.

Question 2

Could I say não tinha tensão instead of não havia tensão?

Accepted Answer

In spoken, informal Portuguese, people sometimes use the verb ter (to have) to mean there is or there was, so you might hear não tinha. However, não havia is the grammatically correct way to express there was not, and it is heavily preferred in Portugal for both writing and careful speech.

Question 3

Why is the word nesta used here instead of na?

Accepted Answer

Nesta is the contraction of em (in) and the feminine demonstrative pronoun esta (this). We use it here because the sentence specifically refers to this assembly. If you used na (em + a), it would just mean in the assembly.

Question 4

Why doesn't the word assembleia have an accent mark?

Accepted Answer

Before a major spelling reform in 1990, words ending with the open diphthong -eia did have an accent mark. Now, words like assembleia and ideia are always written without the accent in modern Portuguese.

Antigamente, não havia tensão geral nesta assembleia.

Breakdown of Antigamente, não havia tensão geral nesta assembleia.

Questions & Answers about Antigamente, não havia tensão geral nesta assembleia.

Learn Antigamente, não havia tensão geral nesta assembleia and more in Portuguese