Breakdown of Con el tiempo, quiero dejar atrás mi miedo y hablar en público con más confianza.
Questions & Answers about Con el tiempo, quiero dejar atrás mi miedo y hablar en público con más confianza.
What does con el tiempo mean here, and is it the same as eventually?
Con el tiempo means with time / over time / in time. It suggests a gradual process, not a sudden result.
In this sentence, it implies:
- As time passes, I want to...
- Over time, I want to...
It is similar to eventually in some contexts, but not exactly the same:
- con el tiempo = emphasis on gradual change
- eventually = emphasis on the final result
So here, con el tiempo fits better because the speaker is talking about personal progress.
Why is it quiero dejar atrás... y hablar... instead of repeating quiero?
In Spanish, after a conjugated verb like quiero, you can add one or more infinitives if the same subject is doing all the actions.
So:
- Quiero dejar atrás mi miedo y hablar en público... means
- I want to leave my fear behind and speak in public...
You do not need to repeat quiero because both dejar atrás and hablar depend on it.
You could repeat it:
- Quiero dejar atrás mi miedo y quiero hablar en público but it sounds more repetitive and less natural here.
What does dejar atrás mean literally and idiomatically?
Literally, dejar atrás means to leave behind.
Idiomatic meanings include:
- to move on from something
- to overcome something
- to stop being held back by something
In this sentence, dejar atrás mi miedo means:
- to leave my fear behind
- to get past my fear
- to overcome my fear
It is a very natural expression in Spanish for emotional or psychological progress.
Why is it mi miedo and not just el miedo?
Mi miedo means my fear, so it makes the fear clearly personal.
Spanish often uses possessives like mi, tu, su when talking about emotions, feelings, or personal experiences:
- mi miedo
- mi inseguridad
- mis dudas
If you said dejar atrás el miedo, that would usually sound more general:
Here, mi miedo is more natural because the speaker is talking about their personal fear.
Why is it hablar en público and not hablar al público?
Hablar en público is the standard expression for to speak in public / to do public speaking.
It focuses on the situation:
By contrast, hablar al público means to speak to the audience / to address the public. That can be correct in other contexts, but it is less about the general skill of public speaking.
Compare:
- Me da miedo hablar en público. = I’m afraid of speaking in public.
- El presidente habló al público. = The president spoke to the public.
So in your sentence, hablar en público is exactly the right choice.
What does con más confianza mean? Is it with more confidence or more confidently?
It literally means with more confidence, but in natural English it often translates as more confidently.
So:
- hablar en público con más confianza can mean
- to speak in public with more confidence or
- to speak in public more confidently
Spanish often uses con + noun where English might prefer an adverb:
- con calma = calmly
- con cuidado = carefully
- con seguridad = confidently / with confidence
Both English translations are fine here.
Why is it más confianza if no comparison is explicitly stated?
Spanish often uses más even when the comparison is only implied.
Here, the implied meaning is:
- more confidence than I have now
So con más confianza means:
This is very common in Spanish. The comparison does not need to be fully spelled out if it is obvious from context.
Could I also say tener más confianza instead of hablar en público con más confianza?
Yes, but the meaning changes slightly.
- Hablar en público con más confianza focuses on how you want to speak.
- Tener más confianza focuses on the internal feeling of confidence itself.
- Quiero hablar en público con más confianza.
= I want to speak in public more confidently. - Quiero tener más confianza al hablar en público.
= I want to feel more confident when speaking in public.
Both are natural, but your original sentence is more action-focused.
Why is there a comma after Con el tiempo?
The comma is used because Con el tiempo is an introductory phrase placed at the beginning of the sentence.
This is common in Spanish:
- En general, ...
- Por suerte, ...
- Con el tiempo, ...
The comma helps separate the introductory idea from the main clause:
- Con el tiempo, quiero dejar atrás mi miedo...
In informal writing, some people may omit such commas, but using it here is standard and clear.
Is this sentence natural in Spain, or would people say it differently?
Yes, it sounds natural in Spain.
It is clear, correct, and idiomatic. A speaker from Spain might also say similar versions such as:
- Con el tiempo, quiero superar mi miedo y hablar en público con más seguridad.
- Quiero ir dejando atrás mi miedo y ganar confianza al hablar en público.
But your original sentence is completely natural and appropriate in European Spanish.
What is the difference between confianza and seguridad in this kind of sentence?
Both can work, but they are slightly different.
- confianza = confidence, self-confidence, trust in yourself
- seguridad = assurance, self-assurance, sense of certainty
In speaking contexts:
- hablar con más confianza sounds personal and emotional
- hablar con más seguridad sounds a bit more like speaking firmly or with assurance
So:
- con más confianza = more self-confident
- con más seguridad = more assured / more secure in delivery
Your sentence with confianza is a very good choice if the focus is overcoming fear.
Can dejar atrás be used for things other than fear?
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning SpanishMaster Spanish — from Con el tiempo, quiero dejar atrás mi miedo y hablar en público con más confianza to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions