Breakdown of mousikomisyo wo sono mama dasuno de ha naku, matigai ga areba saki ni syuuseisita hou ga ii.
Questions & Answers about mousikomisyo wo sono mama dasuno de ha naku, matigai ga areba saki ni syuuseisita hou ga ii.
What does そのまま mean here?
そのまま means as it is, unchanged, or without doing anything to it first.
In this sentence, 申込書をそのまま出す means something like:
- submit the application form as-is
- hand in the application form without checking or fixing it
So the idea is: don’t just submit it unchanged.
Why is 申込書 marked with を?
Because 申込書 is the direct object of 出す.
- 申込書 = application form
- 出す = to submit / hand in / turn in
So:
- 申込書を出す = submit the application form
The particle を marks the thing being submitted.
What does 出すのではなく mean grammatically?
This is a very common pattern:
- verb + のではなく = instead of doing..., rather than doing..., or not ... but ...
Here:
- 出す = submit
- 出すの = the act of submitting
- 出すのではなく = instead of submitting it / rather than submitting it
So:
- 申込書をそのまま出すのではなく
= rather than submitting the application form as it is
This structure often sets up a contrast with what follows.
Why is there a の after 出す?
The の nominalizes the verb, meaning it turns 出す into something like submitting it or the act of submitting it.
Compare:
- 出す = to submit
- 出すの = submitting it / the act of submitting it
Japanese often uses の this way before expressions like:
- のではなく
- のが好き
- のを忘れた
In this sentence, you need the nominalized form because ではなく attaches to that whole action.
Could this use こと instead of の?
Sometimes こと can nominalize a verb too, but here のではなく sounds more natural.
- 出すのではなく = very natural
- 出すことではなく = unnatural in this sentence
In general:
- の often feels more direct and action-based
- こと can sound more abstract or formal depending on context
So for this sentence, の is the normal choice.
What is the role of ではなく? Why not just なく?
ではなく is the negative continuative form of だ / である, and in patterns like A のではなく、B it means:
- it’s not that A; rather B
- instead of A, B
So here the sentence contrasts two actions:
- submitting the form as-is
- correcting it first if there are mistakes
You can think of the structure as:
- A のではなく、B ほうがいい
- Rather than A, B is better
じゃなく is a more casual spoken version of ではなく.
What does 間違いがあれば mean?
It means if there are mistakes.
Breakdown:
- 間違い = mistake(s)
- がある = there is / there are
- あれば = if there is / if there are
So:
- 間違いがあれば = if there are mistakes
This is a conditional form using -ば.
Why is it 間違いがあれば and not 間違いをあれば?
Because ある does not take a direct object with を here. The thing that exists is marked with が.
- 間違いがある = there is a mistake / mistakes exist
So in the conditional:
- 間違いがあれば = if there are mistakes
This is the normal pattern with ある.
What does 先に mean here?
先に means first, beforehand, or in advance.
So:
- 先に修正したほうがいい = it’s better to correct it first
It tells you the correction should happen before the form is submitted.
Why is it 先に and not just 先?
What does 修正したほうがいい mean?
This is another very common grammar pattern:
- verb (past plain form) + ほうがいい = it’s better to do... / you should do...
So:
- 修正したほうがいい = it’s better to correct it
This often gives advice or recommendation.
Why is 修正した in the past form if the action is about the future?
Because in the pattern Vたほうがいい, the past form does not indicate past time. It is simply part of the grammar pattern meaning had better do / it’s better to do.
So:
- 修正したほうがいい = it’s better to correct it
- not it was better to correct it
This is one of those patterns you should learn as a chunk:
- 行ったほうがいい = you should go
- 見たほうがいい = you should watch it
- 確認したほうがいい = you should check it
Is this sentence telling someone what they must do?
What is the overall structure of the sentence?
The sentence is basically:
- A のではなく、B ほうがいい
- Rather than A, it’s better to do B
With the details filled in:
- 申込書をそのまま出すのではなく、 rather than submitting the application form as-is,
- 間違いがあれば if there are mistakes,
- 先に修正したほうがいい。 it’s better to correct them first.
So the sentence contrasts the less desirable action with the better action.
What is the subject of the sentence? Who should do the correcting?
The subject is omitted, which is very normal in Japanese.
From context, it would usually mean:
- you should correct it first
- or more generally, one should correct it first
Japanese often leaves out subjects when they are obvious from context.
So even though there is no explicit あなたは, the sentence naturally implies advice to the person handling the form.
Does 修正する mean correcting the form itself, or correcting the mistakes?
It can be understood as either, but in practice they amount to the same thing here.
- 間違いがあれば = if there are mistakes
- 先に修正したほうがいい = it’s better to correct them / correct it first
In English, we might say either:
- correct the mistakes first
- correct the form first
Japanese often leaves that object unstated when it is obvious from context.
Is this a formal sentence?
Yes, it sounds fairly neutral-to-formal, especially because of:
- ではなく instead of じゃなく
- the vocabulary 申込書 and 修正
It sounds suitable for written instructions, workplace advice, or polite guidance.
A more casual spoken version might be something like:
- 申込書をそのまま出すんじゃなくて、間違いがあったら先に修正したほうがいいよ。
The core meaning is the same, but the tone is more conversational.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning JapaneseMaster Japanese — from mousikomisyo wo sono mama dasuno de ha naku, matigai ga areba saki ni syuuseisita hou ga ii to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions