Breakdown of tantoubusyo ga mada kimatte inai rasikute, henzi ni zikan ga kakatte imasu.
Questions & Answers about tantoubusyo ga mada kimatte inai rasikute, henzi ni zikan ga kakatte imasu.
What does 担当部署 mean?
担当部署 means the department in charge, the responsible department, or the division handling the matter.
- 担当 = in charge of something / responsible for something
- 部署 = department / section / division
So in this sentence, it refers to the office or department that will handle the matter, but that department has apparently not been decided yet.
Why is が used after 担当部署 instead of は?
が marks 担当部署 as the grammatical subject of 決まっていない.
So the structure is:
- 担当部署が決まっていない
- The responsible department has not been decided
Using は would also be possible in some contexts, but it would sound more like you are setting 担当部署 up as the topic for contrast or discussion.
Compare:
- 担当部署がまだ決まっていない
= The responsible department hasn’t been decided yet. - 担当部署はまだ決まっていない
= As for the responsible department, it hasn’t been decided yet.
In this sentence, が sounds natural because the speaker is simply stating the situation.
Why is まだ used with a negative verb? I thought まだ meant still.
This is a very common point of confusion.
まだ can mean:
- still with a positive verb
- not yet with a negative verb
So:
- まだ決まっていない = has not been decided yet
Examples:
- まだ食べています = I am still eating.
- まだ食べていません = I have not eaten yet.
In your sentence, まだ + 決まっていない clearly means not yet decided.
Why is it 決まっていない instead of just 決まらない?
決まっていない describes the current state: something has not been decided.
- 決まる = to be decided
- 決まっている = to be in the state of having been decided
- 決まっていない = to not be in that decided state
So:
- 担当部署がまだ決まっていない
= The responsible department has not been decided yet.
By contrast, 決まらない can sound more like:
- it does not get decided
- it won’t get decided
- it remains undecided
That can be more general or more dynamic. In this sentence, 決まっていない is the natural way to describe the current situation.
Is 決まっていない passive?
No. It is not the passive form.
This is because 決まる is already an intransitive verb, meaning to be decided.
Compare:
- 決める = to decide something
- 決まる = to be decided
So:
- 担当部署を決める = to decide the responsible department
- 担当部署が決まる = the responsible department gets decided / is decided
Then:
- 担当部署が決まっていない = the responsible department has not been decided yet
So even though the English translation often uses a passive-like expression, the Japanese grammar here is not passive.
What does らしくて mean here?
Here, らしくて means something like:
- apparently
- it seems that
- from what I hear / from what it looks like
So:
- 担当部署がまだ決まっていないらしくて = It seems that the responsible department hasn’t been decided yet, and...
The て form of らしい connects this clause to the next one, so the sentence continues on to give the result:
- ...返事に時間がかかっています
- ...so the reply is taking time
So the whole thing has a cause/result feel: Apparently the responsible department hasn’t been decided yet, so the reply is taking time.
How certain is らしい? Is the speaker guessing?
らしい usually means the speaker is not stating a direct fact they know for certain, but is basing it on:
It often sounds like apparently or it seems based on evidence or information.
So the speaker is not saying:
- I know for sure the department has not been decided
They are saying more like:
- From what I can tell / from what I’ve heard, that seems to be the reason
This makes the statement softer and less absolute.
Could らしくて be replaced with そうで or ようで?
Sometimes yes, but the nuance changes a little.
- らしい: apparently / I hear that / it seems
- ようだ: it seems / it appears, often based on observation or reasoning
- そうだ: I heard that / it seems, depending on the type
In this sentence:
- 決まっていないらしくて sounds very natural for apparently it hasn’t been decided
- 決まっていないようで is also possible, and can sound a little more analytical or observational
- 決まっていないそうで would sound more like I heard that it hasn’t been decided
So they are related, but not identical. らしくて is a nice natural choice here because it sounds like the speaker is giving a likely explanation without sounding too definite.
Why is there a に after 返事 in 返事に時間がかかる?
Because 時間がかかる often uses に to mark what the time is spent on.
Pattern:
- A に 時間がかかる
- It takes time for A / A takes time
So:
- 返事に時間がかかる = it takes time to reply = the reply is taking time
Other examples:
- 準備に時間がかかる = preparation takes time
- 修理に時間がかかる = repairs take time
- 説明に時間がかかる = explaining takes time
So 返事に means for the reply / in replying.
Why is it 時間がかかっています and not 時間をかけています?
These are different expressions.
- 時間がかかる = time is required / something takes time
- 時間をかける = to spend time on something intentionally
In this sentence, the focus is on the situation itself:
- 返事に時間がかかっています
- The reply is taking time
That sounds neutral and descriptive.
If you said:
- 返事に時間をかけています
it would sound more like:
- someone is deliberately spending time on the reply
That is a different nuance. Here, かかっています is better because it describes a delay or time requirement, not a deliberate effort.
Why is かかっています in the -te iru form?
Here, -ている shows an ongoing current state.
- 時間がかかる = it takes time
- 時間がかかっています = it is taking time / it has been taking time
The idea is that the delay is happening right now.
So the sentence is not just a general statement like:
- Replies take time
It is saying:
- At the moment, the reply is taking time
This makes sense because the speaker is explaining the present situation.
What is the relationship between the two parts of the sentence?
The first part gives the apparent reason, and the second part gives the result.
- 担当部署がまだ決まっていないらしくて = apparently the responsible department hasn’t been decided yet
- 返事に時間がかかっています = so the reply is taking time
So the flow is:
- the department in charge has apparently not been decided yet
- because of that, the reply is delayed
The て in らしくて links the clauses in a way that often suggests and so or because of that.
Who is actually taking time to reply? The sentence does not say.
That’s normal in Japanese. The sentence leaves the agent unstated because it is either obvious from context or not important.
What matters here is the situation:
- the responsible department is not yet decided
- therefore the reply is taking time
The sentence does not explicitly say who is delaying the reply. Depending on context, it could be:
- a company
- an office
- a team
- the person being contacted
Japanese often omits subjects and agents when they can be understood from context.
Is the comma important after らしくて?
The comma helps readability, but it is not essential grammar.
It shows a pause between:
- the explanation
- the result
So it makes the sentence easier to process:
- 担当部署がまだ決まっていないらしくて、
- 返事に時間がかかっています。
In writing, Japanese commas are often used more flexibly than English commas. This one is natural, but the sentence could still be understood without it.
Could this sentence sound polite enough in business Japanese?
It is understandable and fairly natural, but by itself it is more like a neutral explanatory statement than very formal business wording.
A more polished business-style version might be something like:
- 担当部署がまだ決まっていないようで、ご返答までにお時間をいただいております。
That said, your original sentence is perfectly useful for learning because it clearly shows several common patterns:
- まだ ~ていない
- らしい / らしくて
- ~に時間がかかる
- ~ています for an ongoing situation
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning JapaneseMaster Japanese — from tantoubusyo ga mada kimatte inai rasikute, henzi ni zikan ga kakatte imasu to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions