eki made hasitta node, poketto no hankati de kao wo huita.

Yes—here まで means up to / as far as, and in natural English it often becomes to.

So:

• 駅まで走った = ran to the station

A useful nuance is that まで focuses on the endpoint. It tells you where the running continued until.

Compare:

• 駅に走った → less natural here if you mean the whole route up to the station
• 駅まで走った → clearly ran all the way to the station

Because the speaker is talking about a completed action in the past.

• 走った = past form of 走る (ran)
• ので = because / since

So 走ったので means because I ran or because I had run.

The whole sentence is in the past:

• 走った = ran
• ふいた = wiped

So the timing is consistent.

Both can mean because, but they feel a little different.

• ので sounds a bit more explanatory, softer, and more neutral
• から can sound more direct or more like the speaker’s personal assertion

In this sentence:

• 駅まで走ったので、顔をふいた。
  = Because I ran to the station, I wiped my face.

This sounds like a natural explanation of what happened.

If you used から:

• 駅まで走ったから、顔をふいた。

That is also grammatical, but it can sound a bit more conversational or forceful depending on context.

The subject is omitted, which is very common in Japanese.

From context, the natural understanding is:

• I ran to the station, so I wiped my face with the handkerchief in my pocket.

Japanese often leaves out words like I, you, or he/she when they are obvious.

So even though there is no 私 in the sentence, the listener usually understands the subject from context.

Grammatically, A の B can connect nouns in many ways, not just possession.

Here ポケットのハンカチ means:

• the handkerchief in the pocket
• or more naturally, the handkerchief from my pocket / in my pocket

So の is showing a relationship between the two nouns, not strict ownership.

In English, we often have to choose a more specific translation, but Japanese leaves that relationship broader.

A fuller version could be:

• ポケットに入っているハンカチ = the handkerchief that is in the pocket

But ポケットのハンカチ is shorter and natural.

Because ポケットのハンカチ is a noun phrase, not a full clause.

Here:

• ポケット modifies ハンカチ
• の links the two nouns

So the structure is:

• ポケットのハンカチ = pocket-handkerchief → the handkerchief in the pocket

If you say:

• ポケットにあるハンカチ
• ポケットに入っているハンカチ

then に appears because now you have a verb phrase (ある, 入っている).

So:

• ポケットのハンカチ = short noun+noun style
• ポケットにあるハンカチ = fuller descriptive phrase

Here で marks the means or tool used to do something.

So:

• ハンカチで顔をふいた = wiped my face with a handkerchief

This is the same で used in sentences like:

• はしで食べる = eat with chopsticks
• ペンで書く = write with a pen

So ハンカチで means using a handkerchief.

Because 拭く（ふく） usually takes the thing being wiped as a direct object with を.

So:

• 顔をふく = wipe one’s face
• 机をふく = wipe the desk

The face is the thing receiving the wiping action, so it gets を.

If you used に, it would not fit the standard pattern of this verb in this sentence.

ふいた is the past form of 拭く（ふく）, meaning to wipe.

This is because 拭く is a ku-verb, and many verbs ending in く change like this:

• 書く → 書いた
• 聞く → 聞いた
• 拭く → 拭いた

So:

• dictionary form: 拭く
• past plain form: 拭いた

It is not ふくた because Japanese past forms are made by sound-change patterns, not by simply adding た directly to the dictionary form.

ハンカチ means handkerchief. It is a loanword from English.

It does not normally mean tissue.

• ハンカチ = reusable cloth handkerchief
• ティッシュ = tissue

So in this sentence, the speaker is using an actual handkerchief, not a paper tissue.

Japanese often puts the reason or background information before the main action.

So this pattern is very common:

• [reason] ので、[result/action]

Here:

• 駅まで走ったので = because I ran to the station
• ポケットのハンカチで顔をふいた = I wiped my face with the handkerchief in my pocket

This order feels natural in Japanese because it sets up the situation first and then gives the main action.

Yes. That is the most natural interpretation.

Japanese often leaves out possessives like my when they are obvious from context. Since the same person ran and then used the handkerchief, ポケット is naturally understood as my pocket.

So a natural English translation would be:

• Because I ran to the station, I wiped my face with the handkerchief in my pocket.

Even though my does not appear explicitly in Japanese, it is understood.

The comma after ので helps readability, but it is not strictly required every time.

• 駅まで走ったので、ポケットのハンカチで顔をふいた。
• 駅まで走ったのでポケットのハンカチで顔をふいた。

Both are understandable, but the comma makes the break between the reason and the main action clearer.

In written Japanese, commas are often used to make sentences easier to read, even when they are not grammatically mandatory.