אם לא נבדוק את כל הפרטים עכשיו, זה הולך להיות קשה יותר מחר בבוקר.

That is a very common question. Hebrew and English handle if-clauses differently.

In Hebrew, after אם (if), it is very normal to use the future tense when talking about a real future possibility:

• אם לא נבדוק... = If we don’t check...

So even though the Hebrew verb is grammatically future, the natural English translation usually uses the present after if.

This is standard Hebrew, not a special exception.

נבדוק means we will check or we will examine.

It is:

• 1st person plural
• future tense
• from the verb לבדוק = to check / to inspect / to examine

So:

• נבדוק = we will check
• לא נבדוק = we will not check

In this sentence, it means if we don’t check.

Hebrew often leaves out subject pronouns when the verb already makes the subject clear.

Since נבדוק already means we will check, there is no need to add אנחנו.

So:

• אם לא נבדוק = natural
• אם אנחנו לא נבדוק = also possible, but more emphatic

Adding אנחנו might sound like:

• if we don’t check... as opposed to someone else.

את is the direct object marker. It appears before a definite direct object.

Here, כל הפרטים means all the details, and it is definite because הפרטים = the details.

So:

• נבדוק את כל הפרטים = we will check all the details

A few comparisons:

• אני קורא ספר = I am reading a book → no את
• אני קורא את הספר = I am reading the book → את is needed

Because כל הפרטים includes the details, את is required here.

In Hebrew, כל means all or every, and when it refers to a specific group, the noun after it is often definite.

So:

• כל הפרטים = all the details
• literally, something like all the details

This is a normal Hebrew structure:

• כל הילדים = all the children
• כל הספרים = all the books

Literally, הולך comes from to go / to walk, but in this expression it works like going to in English.

So:

• זה הולך להיות קשה יותר = it’s going to be harder

This is a very common spoken Hebrew way to talk about the future.

It does not mean actual walking here. It is a future expression, just like English going to be.

Yes. A very natural alternative would be:

• אם לא נבדוק את כל הפרטים עכשיו, יהיה קשה יותר מחר בבוקר.

That means the same thing:
If we don’t check all the details now, it will be harder tomorrow morning.

The difference is mainly in style:

• יהיה = simpler, more neutral, often a bit more direct
• הולך להיות = very common in speech, a bit more conversational, like is going to be

Both are correct.

זה here functions like it in English:

• זה הולך להיות קשה יותר = it’s going to be harder

Hebrew often uses זה in this kind of sentence, especially in spoken language, when talking about a whole situation.

You could also hear:

• יהיה קשה יותר = it will be harder

So זה is not pointing to one specific object. It refers to the situation as a whole.

Hebrew usually forms the comparative with:

• יותר = more

So:

• קשה = hard / difficult
• קשה יותר = harder / more difficult

This pattern is very common:

• גדול = big

• יותר גדול = bigger

• מהיר = fast
• יותר מהיר = faster

So Hebrew usually does not change the adjective itself the way English sometimes does with -er. It often uses יותר instead.

מחר בבוקר is the normal Hebrew way to say tomorrow morning.

It is a fixed, natural time expression:

• מחר בבוקר = tomorrow morning
• מחר בערב = tomorrow evening
• מחר בלילה = tomorrow night

While Hebrew word order can sometimes be flexible, מחר בבוקר is the standard, idiomatic order.

It can mean both, depending on context.

In this sentence:

• עכשיו means now / at this point / already tonight rather than tomorrow morning

It does not necessarily mean this exact second, but it does contrast with מחר בבוקר.

So the idea is:

• check the details now
• because otherwise it will be harder tomorrow morning

In sentences like this, קשה is being used predicatively:

• it is hard
• it will be hard
• it’s going to be hard

Because the subject is the general זה (it / this situation), masculine singular is the default form here.

So:

• זה קשה = it is hard
• זה הולך להיות קשה = it’s going to be hard

This is very normal.

Sometimes yes, but not always perfectly.

Here:

• אם לא נבדוק... = if we don’t check...

In English, you might also say:

• unless we check...

But the Hebrew sentence literally uses the structure if not:

• אם = if
• לא = not

So it is best for learners to understand it first as:

• if we do not check

Then, if the English context allows, unless may also sound natural.

It sounds natural and fairly conversational, especially because of זה הולך להיות.

Parts like:

• אם לא נבדוק את כל הפרטים עכשיו are neutral and standard
• זה הולך להיות makes it sound more spoken and everyday

A slightly more formal or concise version would be:

• אם לא נבדוק את כל הפרטים עכשיו, יהיה קשה יותר מחר בבוקר.

Both are good Hebrew.

A native speaker would often stress the time contrast:

• אם לא נבדוק את כל הפרטים עכשיו, זה הולך להיות קשה יותר מחר בבוקר.

The important contrast is:

• עכשיו = now
• מחר בבוקר = tomorrow morning

So the sentence is really saying:

• do it now, because later it will be harder

That contrast is one of the main ideas of the sentence.

Yes. לבדוק can mean:

• check
• inspect
• examine
• look into

So נבדוק את כל הפרטים could mean:

• check all the details
• go over all the details
• review all the details

The exact English choice depends on context, but check is the most straightforward translation here.