Log inSign up

La supo estas varma kaj bona, sed la infano volas ion pli dolĉan post la tagmanĝo.

La supo estas varma kaj bona, sed la infano volas ion pli dolĉan post la tagmanĝo.
The soup is warm and good, but the child wants something sweeter after lunch.
FromLesson 10inHardcore Esperanto

Questions & Answers about La supo estas varma kaj bona, sed la infano volas ion pli dolĉan post la tagmanĝo.

Why is it la supo and la infano? Why does Esperanto use la here?

La is the definite article, meaning the.

So:

  • la supo = the soup
  • la infano = the child
  • la tagmanĝo = the lunch / the midday meal

Esperanto has only one article, la. It does not change for gender, number, or case.

English speakers often notice that Esperanto uses la in very straightforward ways. If the speaker means a specific soup or a specific child, la is used.

Why do varma and bona end in -a?

In Esperanto, adjectives end in -a.

So:

  • varma = warm
  • bona = good
  • dolĉa = sweet

In the sentence, varma and bona describe supo, so they are adjectives.

A useful basic pattern is:

  • noun: -o
  • adjective: -a
  • adverb: -e

So:

  • supo = soup
  • varma supo = warm soup
  • bona supo = good soup

Even after estas, the words describing the noun are still adjectives, so they keep the -a ending:

  • La supo estas varma kaj bona.
Why is it estas?

Estas is the present-tense form of esti, meaning to be.

So:

  • estas = is / are / am

In Esperanto, the same present-tense ending -as is used for all subjects:

  • mi estas = I am
  • vi estas = you are
  • li/ŝi estas = he/she is
  • la supo estas = the soup is

That is much simpler than English, because Esperanto verbs do not change according to the subject.

Why is it volas?

Volas is the present-tense form of voli, meaning to want.

So:

  • la infano volas = the child wants

Again, Esperanto uses the same present-tense ending -as for every subject. You do not need a special form like English wants.

Compare:

  • English: I want, the child wants
  • Esperanto: mi volas, la infano volas
Why is it ion instead of io?

This is one of the most important grammar points in the sentence.

  • io = something
  • ion = something (as a direct object)

The -n ending marks the direct object in Esperanto.

Here, the child wants something, so something is the direct object of volas. That is why Esperanto uses ion.

So:

  • La infano volas ion. = The child wants something.

Without the -n, it would be grammatically incomplete in standard Esperanto.

Why is it dolĉan and not dolĉa?

Because dolĉan describes ion, and ion is in the accusative.

In Esperanto, adjectives agree with the nouns they describe in number and case.

Here:

  • ion = something (direct object, so it has -n)
  • dolĉan = sweet (also takes -n to match ion)

So:

  • ion dolĉan = something sweet

This agreement is very regular:

  • bona supo = good soup
  • bonan supon = good soup (as a direct object)

In your sentence, ion pli dolĉan means something sweeter.

What does pli dolĉan mean exactly?

Pli means more and is used to form the comparative.

So:

  • dolĉa = sweet
  • pli dolĉa = sweeter / more sweet

In the sentence:

  • ion pli dolĉan = something sweeter

Notice that English often uses -er (sweeter), but Esperanto usually uses pli:

  • bela = beautiful
  • pli bela = more beautiful / prettier
  • dolĉa = sweet
  • pli dolĉa = sweeter

There is no need for a special adjective ending like English -er.

Sweeter than what? Why is there no than phrase?

Esperanto does not need to state the thing being compared if it is understood from context.

So ion pli dolĉan simply means:

  • something sweeter
  • or more literally, something more sweet

The comparison target is implied. In context, it probably means something sweeter than the soup, or sweeter than what the child has had so far.

If you wanted to say sweeter than the soup, Esperanto would use ol:

  • ion pli dolĉan ol la supo

But in your sentence, that extra comparison is not stated.

Why is it post la tagmanĝo and not post la tagmanĝon?

Because post is a preposition, and normally Esperanto prepositions take a noun without the accusative -n.

So:

  • post la tagmanĝo = after lunch

The -n is mainly used for:

  1. direct objects
  2. motion toward something in certain expressions
  3. some time/measure expressions

Here, la tagmanĝo is the object of the preposition post, not the direct object of a verb, so it stays:

  • post la tagmanĝo

not

  • post la tagmanĝon
Why is there la in post la tagmanĝo? Could it be just post tagmanĝo?

Yes, in some contexts you may see expressions like post tagmanĝo, but post la tagmanĝo is also perfectly natural.

Using la makes the meal sound more specific: after the lunch / after the meal relevant in the situation.

Without la, the phrase can feel a bit more general or idiomatic, depending on context.

For a learner, the important point is that post la tagmanĝo is fully correct and easy to understand.

Why is the word order La supo estas varma kaj bona, sed la infano volas...? Could it be different?

This is a very normal Esperanto word order:

  • subject + verb + complement
  • then sed = but
  • then another clause

So:

  • La supo = the soup
  • estas varma kaj bona = is warm and good
  • sed = but
  • la infano volas ion pli dolĉan = the child wants something sweeter

Esperanto word order is fairly flexible, but this sentence uses the most neutral, beginner-friendly order.

Because Esperanto marks grammar clearly with endings, some rearrangement is possible, especially for emphasis. But the given version is the most natural default.

What does sed do here?

Sed means but.

It connects two contrasting ideas:

  • The soup is warm and good
  • but the child wants something sweeter

So sed shows that the second idea goes against what you might expect from the first. Even though the soup is good, the child still wants something sweeter.

Is infano specifically a boy or a girl?

No. Infano is gender-neutral and means child.

If the sentence does not need to specify gender, Esperanto often uses a neutral noun like infano.

That is one thing English speakers often find convenient: the noun itself does not force you to say boy or girl unless it matters.

Why doesn’t kaj get repeated between all the parts?

Kaj simply means and.

Here it connects the two adjectives:

  • varma kaj bona = warm and good

That is completely normal. Esperanto uses kaj much like English and.

There is no need to repeat it unless the sentence structure calls for it.

Can I translate bona as nice here, or does it specifically mean good?

The basic meaning of bona is good.

In context, La supo estas varma kaj bona means the soup is warm and tastes good / is good.

Depending on context, English might sometimes use nice, but good is the most direct and reliable translation for bona.

For learners, it is best to remember:

  • bona = good

and then allow context to shape the most natural English wording.

What are the main endings I should notice in this sentence?

This sentence is a great example of core Esperanto endings:

  • -o = noun
    • supo, infano, tagmanĝo
  • -a = adjective
    • varma, bona, dolĉa
  • -as = present-tense verb
    • estas, volas
  • -n = accusative/direct object
    • ion, dolĉan

If you can recognize those endings, the sentence becomes much easier to understand structurally.

More from this lesson

Matene mi lavas miajn manojn kaj vizaĝon en la banĉambro.Mia fratino lavas siajn harojn per akvo kaj sapo en la duŝo.La sapo odoras bone, kaj post la duŝo ni sentas nin puraj.manomalpuralaviilinSe miaj manoj estas malpuraj, mi lavas ilin denove.
AI Language TutorTry it ↗
“What's the best way to learn Esperanto grammar?”
Esperanto grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Esperanto

Master Esperanto — from La supo estas varma kaj bona, sed la infano volas ion pli dolĉan post la tagmanĝo to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.

  • ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions
Start learning Esperanto freeBrowse the full course