Breakdown of Aflysningen af mødet kom for sent, så jeg var allerede på kontoret.
Questions & Answers about Aflysningen af mødet kom for sent, så jeg var allerede på kontoret.
Why is it aflysningen and not en aflysning?
Because aflysningen is the definite form of the noun aflysning: the cancellation.
In Danish, definiteness is often shown by adding an ending to the noun instead of using a separate word like the:
- en aflysning = a cancellation
- aflysningen = the cancellation
So Aflysningen af mødet means the cancellation of the meeting.
Why does it say af mødet?
Af here means of.
So:
- aflysningen = the cancellation
- af mødet = of the meeting
Together:
- Aflysningen af mødet = the cancellation of the meeting
This is a very common Danish pattern:
- åbningen af butikken = the opening of the shop
- slutningen af filmen = the end of the film
Why is it mødet and not just møde?
Because the sentence is referring to a specific meeting: the meeting, not just a meeting or meeting in general.
- et møde = a meeting
- mødet = the meeting
So:
- aflysningen af mødet = the cancellation of the meeting
If you said aflysningen af et møde, that would mean the cancellation of a meeting, which is less specific.
What does kom for sent literally mean, and is that a normal Danish expression?
Yes, it is completely normal.
Literally, kom for sent means came too late, but in natural English here it means something like:
- arrived too late
- came too late
- was too late
So Aflysningen af mødet kom for sent means the cancellation notice happened too late for the speaker to avoid going in.
Danish often uses kom in cases where English might prefer something like arrived or came through.
Why is it for sent and not something else?
For sent is the standard expression for too late.
- sent = late
- for sent = too late
Examples:
- Jeg kom for sent. = I arrived too late / I was late.
- Beskeden kom for sent. = The message came too late.
So in your sentence, the cancellation happened too late to be useful.
What is the subject of the first clause?
The subject is the whole noun phrase:
Aflysningen af mødet
That entire phrase means the cancellation of the meeting, and it is the thing that kom for sent.
So the structure is:
- Aflysningen af mødet = subject
- kom = verb
- for sent = adverbial phrase
Why is så used here?
Så means so in this sentence.
It links the first clause and the second clause:
- Aflysningen af mødet kom for sent = The cancellation of the meeting came too late
- så jeg var allerede på kontoret = so I was already at the office
So så shows a result:
The cancellation came too late, so I was already at the office.
Why is the word order så jeg var allerede and not så var jeg allerede?
Because så here is being used as a coordinating conjunction meaning so, and after that, Danish normally uses normal main-clause order:
- jeg = subject
- var = verb
- allerede = adverb
So:
- så jeg var allerede på kontoret
If så is used differently, especially as an adverb meaning then, you can get inversion:
- Så var jeg allerede på kontoret. = Then I was already at the office.
But in your sentence, så means so, connecting two clauses, so jeg var is the natural order.
Why is allerede placed after var?
Because in a normal main clause where the subject comes first, sentence adverbs like allerede usually come after the finite verb.
So:
- jeg var allerede på kontoret
Breakdown:
- jeg = subject
- var = finite verb
- allerede = adverb
- på kontoret = prepositional phrase
This placement is very typical in Danish:
- Jeg har allerede spist. = I have already eaten.
- Hun kommer sikkert senere. = She will probably come later.
Why does it say på kontoret and not i kontoret?
Because Danish often uses på for places like workplaces, institutions, and locations where someone is present for a purpose.
So:
- på kontoret = at the office
- på skolen = at the school
- på hospitalet = at the hospital
I kontoret would usually sound wrong here. I is more often used for being physically inside something in a literal spatial sense, but with kontor, Danish normally says på kontoret when talking about being at work / at the office.
Why is the sentence in the past tense?
Because it describes a completed situation in the past.
The two past-tense verbs are:
- kom = past tense of komme
- var = past tense of være
So the sequence is:
- The cancellation came too late.
- As a result, the speaker was already at the office.
Both actions are viewed from a past point of time.
Is aflysning related to a verb?
Yes. Aflysning is the noun form related to the verb at aflyse, which means to cancel.
So:
- at aflyse = to cancel
- en aflysning = a cancellation
- aflysningen = the cancellation
This is a useful word family to learn together.
Could a Dane also say this in a different way?
Yes. A few natural alternatives are possible, depending on style.
For example:
Mødet blev aflyst for sent, så jeg var allerede på kontoret.
- The meeting was cancelled too late, so I was already at the office.
Aflysningen kom for sent, så jeg var allerede på kontoret.
- The cancellation came too late, so I was already at the office.
Your original sentence is completely correct, but some speakers might choose a shorter version if the meeting has already been established in context.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning DanishMaster Danish — from Aflysningen af mødet kom for sent, så jeg var allerede på kontoret to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions