Breakdown of Die simptoom en min eetlus maak my bekommerd.
Questions & Answers about Die simptoom en min eetlus maak my bekommerd.
Why is die used at the beginning?
What does min eetlus mean literally?
Literally, min eetlus means little appetite.
Breaking it down:
- min = little, not much
- eetlus = appetite
So the phrase naturally means:
- poor appetite
- little appetite
- lack of appetite in context
Afrikaans often uses simple quantity words like min in places where English might use a more abstract phrase.
Why is there no article before min eetlus?
Because min eetlus is being used as a general condition, not as a specific countable thing.
In Afrikaans, phrases like these often appear without an article:
- min eetlus = little appetite
- baie geld = a lot of money
- genoeg tyd = enough time
If you added die or 'n, it would change the nuance and usually sound less natural here. So min eetlus works well as an article-less noun phrase.
Is eetlus one word or two?
It is a compound noun:
- eet = eat
- lus = desire, liking
Together, eetlus means appetite.
This is very normal in Afrikaans: compound nouns are often written as one word.
But min eetlus is two words, because min is a separate modifier describing the noun eetlus.
Why is the verb maak used here?
The pattern maak + object + adjective means make someone/something + adjective.
So:
- maak my bekommerd = makes me worried
This is a very common Afrikaans structure. Similar examples:
- Dit maak my moeg = It makes me tired
- Dit maak my bly = It makes me happy
- Dit maak my kwaad = It makes me angry
So in your sentence, the symptom and poor appetite are the things that cause the speaker to feel worried.
Why is it bekommerd and not a verb?
Here, bekommerd is an adjective, meaning worried or concerned.
The sentence uses the pattern:
- iets maak iemand bekommerd
= something makes someone worried
That is why bekommerd appears as an adjective, not as the main verb.
Compare:
- Ek is bekommerd = I am worried
- Dit maak my bekommerd = It makes me worried
Afrikaans does also have verbal ways to express this idea, but this adjective pattern is very natural and common.
Why is the verb maak the same form even though the subject includes two things?
Because Afrikaans verbs do not usually change form for person or number in the present tense.
So you get:
- Ek maak
- Jy maak
- Hy maak
- Ons maak
- Hulle maak
All use maak.
That means you do not have to worry about choosing a special plural verb form. Even though the subject is die simptoom en min eetlus, the verb is still simply maak.
Why is the word order ... maak my bekommerd?
This follows normal Afrikaans main-clause word order.
Afrikaans is a verb-second language in main clauses. That means the finite verb usually comes in the second position.
Here the first position is taken by the whole subject:
- Die simptoom en min eetlus
Then the verb comes next:
Then the rest follows:
- my bekommerd
So the structure is:
- Subject
- finite verb
- object
- finite verb
If something else came first, the verb would still stay second:
- Vandag maak die simptoom en min eetlus my bekommerd.
Could I also say Dit bekommer my?
Yes, you could, but it is a slightly different structure.
Both are possible. The version with maak ... bekommerd is very transparent for learners because it works like make + adjective in English.
The verb bekommer by itself can sound a little more formal or direct depending on context.
So the sentence you were given is perfectly natural and easy to understand.
Why is simptoom singular? Should it be simptome?
Simptoom is singular, so it means one symptom.
Its plural is simptome.
So:
- die simptoom = the symptom
- die simptome = the symptoms
Whether singular or plural is correct depends on what the speaker means. If they are talking about one particular symptom plus poor appetite, simptoom is fine. If they mean several symptoms, then simptome would be more natural.
Could I repeat the article and say die simptoom en die min eetlus?
Grammatically, repeating the article is possible in some coordinated phrases, but here it would usually sound less natural.
Why?
- die simptoom refers to a specific symptom
- min eetlus is being treated more like a general condition or state
So the more natural wording is:
- Die simptoom en min eetlus maak my bekommerd.
If you said die min eetlus, it might sound as if you were referring to a very specific previously mentioned instance of poor appetite, which is usually not the intended idea here.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning AfrikaansMaster Afrikaans — from Die simptoom en min eetlus maak my bekommerd to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions