Breakdown of Si l'avocat avait préparé le dossier, il n'aurait pas perdu le procès.
il
he
avoir
to have
ne
not (used before the verb)
pas
not (used after the verb)
préparer
to prepare
le dossier
the file / the folder
perdre
to lose
si
if
l'avocat
the lawyer (m)
le procès
the trial
Questions & Answers about Si l'avocat avait préparé le dossier, il n'aurait pas perdu le procès.
Why do we use avait préparé in the first part and aurait perdu in the second?
This is the classic third conditional structure used to talk about things that didn't happen in the past. The si (if) part uses the plus-que-parfait (pluperfect) to set the past condition: avait préparé (had prepared). The main result clause uses the past conditional: aurait perdu (would have lost). Just like in English, you never put the conditional 'would have' part right next to si!
Where do the negative words ne and pas go in the past conditional part of the sentence?
In compound tenses like the past conditional, ne and pas surround the conjugated helping verb (the auxiliary). Here, the helping verb is aurait, so the negation wraps around it: n'aurait pas. The past participle perdu (lost) stays outside this sandwich: il n'aurait pas perdu (he would not have lost).
Wait, doesn't avocat mean 'avocado'?
Can procès mean 'process'?
No, le procès is a false friend! It almost always means 'the trial' or 'the lawsuit' in a legal context. If you want to say 'the process' (like a step-by-step method), you would use le processus or le procédé.
Learn Si l'avocat avait préparé le dossier, il n'aurait pas perdu le procès and more in French
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free