Learn Farsi: تا زمانی که این قدرت موروثی یکپارچه است، هیچ دشمنی نمی‌تواند آن را شکست دهد. - As long as this hereditary power is unified, no enemy can defeat it.

تا زمانی که این قدرت موروثی یکپارچه است، هیچ دشمنی نمی‌تواند آن را شکست دهد.tâ zamâni ke in qodrat mowruthi yekpârche ast, hich doshmani nemitavânad ân râ shekast dahad.

As long as this hereditary power is unified, no enemy can defeat it.

Breakdown of تا زمانی که این قدرت موروثی یکپارچه است، هیچ دشمنی نمی‌تواند آن را شکست دهد.

definite direct object marker

Questions & Answers about تا زمانی که این قدرت موروثی یکپارچه است، هیچ دشمنی نمی‌تواند آن را شکست دهد.

Why does the verb after tâ zamâni ke use the indicative (ast) instead of the subjunctive?

Unlike agar (if) which usually sets up a hypothetical situation requiring the subjunctive, tâ zamâni ke (as long as) often focuses on a factual, ongoing duration. Because this sentence treats the unified power as a current, continuing reality rather than a mere possibility, it uses the present indicative ast (is).

Why is there an -i suffix on doshmani?

In negative sentences, when hich (no/any) modifies a singular countable noun, that noun typically takes the indefinite suffix -i. Adding this suffix to doshman (enemy) creates hich doshmani, emphasizing that absolutely no enemy of any kind can defeat it.

Why is shekast dehad in the subjunctive here, while the other verbs are indicative?

It follows the modal verb nemitavânad (cannot). While the modal verb itself is in the indicative to state a factual lack of ability, the action that follows it must always take the present subjunctive. Thus, we use dehad, the subjunctive form of dâdan, for the compound verb shekast dâdan (to defeat).

What is the literal breakdown of the word yekpârche?

It is a compound word made of yek (one) and pârche (piece or cloth). When combined into yekpârche, it takes on the figurative meaning of "unified," "integrated," or "seamless."