شما باید حقیقت مطلق را بپذیرید، وگرنه عواقب آن را نمی‌فهمید.

Questions & Answers about شما باید حقیقت مطلق را بپذیرید، وگرنه عواقب آن را نمی‌فهمید.

Why is نمی‌فهمید (you will not understand) in the present indicative tense instead of the subjunctive?
The word وگرنه (otherwise/or else) sets up a negative conditional consequence. In Farsi, the consequence following وگرنه is treated as a factual reality if the first condition fails, so we use the indicative (or future) tense. Here, the present indicative نمی‌فهمید acts as that definite future outcome.
How does the grammar of the first clause contrast with the وگرنه clause?
The first clause uses باید (must), which always requires the subjunctive mood (here, بپذیرید) because it expresses an obligation rather than a stated fact. This perfectly demonstrates the lesson's pattern: a subjunctive obligation or suggestion in the first half, followed by وگرنه, and concluding with an indicative consequence.
Why doesn't the word عواقب (consequences) have a standard Farsi plural suffix?
عواقب is an Arabic 'broken plural' for the singular word عاقبت (aghebat - outcome/consequence). At the B2 level, you will frequently see these irregular Arabic plurals used in formal, intellectual, or abstract contexts instead of standard Farsi plurals like عاقبت‌ها.
Could we drop the second را after عواقب آن?
No, it is required here. The phrase عواقب آن (its consequences) refers to a specific, known thing because of the pronoun آن (its/that). This makes it the definite direct object of the verb نمی‌فهمید (you do not understand). Whenever a direct object is specific and definite, the marker را is mandatory.

Learn شما باید حقیقت مطلق را بپذیرید، وگرنه عواقب آن را نمی‌فهمید and more in Farsi

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free