Question 1

Why is bâz mi-kardi (Past Continuous) used here instead of a past perfect form for 'should have opened'?

Accepted Answer

To express an unfulfilled past obligation ('should have done something'), Farsi often pairs mi-bâyast with the Past Continuous tense. Even though it translates to 'should have opened', the structure feels a bit like 'it was necessary that you were opening'.

Question 2

Could we use the Present Subjunctive instead of the Past Continuous in the second half of this sentence?

Accepted Answer

Yes! After mi-bâyast, you can use either the Past Continuous (bâz mi-kardi) or the Present Subjunctive (bâz koni). Both are perfectly correct and commonly used to mean 'you should have opened'.

Question 3

Why is râ placed after yâs (jasmine) instead of bu (smell)? Isn't the smell the direct object?

Accepted Answer

The direct object is the entire noun phrase 'the smell of jasmine' (bu-ye yâs). The object marker râ always goes at the very end of the whole phrase, attaching to the final word in the ezâfe chain.

Question 4

Is hes kardan (to feel/sense) the standard way to talk about smelling things?

Accepted Answer

It is very common! While you can use bu kardan (to smell) for the active action of sniffing something, hes kardan is often used when talking about passively noticing or sensing an odor in the air.

Question 5

What difference does the mi- prefix make in mi-bâyast compared to just bâyast?

Accepted Answer

Grammatically, it emphasizes the continuous or past nature of the obligation. However, in everyday usage, mi-bâyast and bâyast are completely interchangeable when expressing unfulfilled past obligations ('should have').

من بوی یاس را حس نمی‌کنم، تو می‌بایست آن بطری را باز می‌کردی.

Breakdown of من بوی یاس را حس نمی‌کنم، تو می‌بایست آن بطری را باز می‌کردی.

Questions & Answers about من بوی یاس را حس نمی‌کنم، تو می‌بایست آن بطری را باز می‌کردی.

Learn من بوی یاس را حس نمی‌کنم، تو می‌بایست آن بطری را باز می‌کردی and more in Farsi