Uitgaande van een rationeel standpunt, kunnen we concluderen dat het een illusie was.

Questions & Answers about Uitgaande van een rationeel standpunt, kunnen we concluderen dat het een illusie was.

How does uitgaande van work here, and what verb does it come from?
It comes from the separable verb uitgaan van, which means "to assume" or "to start from". By adding -d to the infinitive, we get the present participle (uitgaand), and adding an -e makes it uitgaande. Used together with van, it translates to "assuming" or "proceeding from" a certain premise.
Could we use afgaande op instead of uitgaande van in this sentence?
Not quite, because they have different nuances. Uitgaande van means "assuming" or "starting from" a premise or standpoint. Afgaande op means "judging by" or "going by" external evidence or appearances (for example, "judging by his reaction"). Since a "rational point of view" is a conceptual premise rather than observed evidence, uitgaande van is the correct choice here.
Why does the main clause start with kunnen we instead of we kunnen?
The entire participial phrase (Uitgaande van een rationeel standpunt) occupies the first grammatical position in the sentence. Because Dutch is a V2 (verb-second) language, the conjugated verb (kunnen) must come exactly in the second position, causing inversion where it is immediately followed by the subject (we).
Why doesn't the adjective rationeel get an -e at the end?
Because standpunt is a neuter word (het standpunt). As a quick refresher: when a neuter noun is introduced by the indefinite article een, any adjective placed immediately before it does not get the usual -e ending.

Learn Uitgaande van een rationeel standpunt, kunnen we concluderen dat het een illusie was and more in Dutch

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free