Dit zware harnas was onmogelijk te dragen zonder een schild en een zwaard.

Questions & Answers about Dit zware harnas was onmogelijk te dragen zonder een schild en een zwaard.

How could we use the word waaronder from this lesson to say "without weapons, including a shield and a sword"?
You would say: zonder wapens, waaronder een schild en een zwaard. Waaronder literally translates as "under which", but it is the standard Dutch way to say "including" or "among which" when you are giving examples that belong to a broader category mentioned just before it.
Since harnas is a neuter (het) word, why does the adjective get an -e ending (zware)?
Because it is preceded by the demonstrative pronoun dit (this). For neuter nouns, the adjective only drops the -e ending when it is preceded by een, geen, or nothing at all (e.g., een zwaar harnas). Since dit makes the noun specific, the adjective gets the standard -e ending.
Why does zware have only one a, when the root word is zwaar?
This is a classic Dutch spelling rule about open and closed syllables. When you add the -e ending, the word splits into syllables as zwa-re. Because the first syllable now ends in a vowel (an "open" syllable), a single a naturally makes a long vowel sound. Writing zwaare would be a spelling mistake.
Could I say onmogelijk om te dragen instead of just onmogelijk te dragen?
Yes, both are completely correct. After adjectives evaluating an action—like onmogelijk (impossible), moeilijk (difficult), or makkelijk (easy)—you can use either te + infinitive or om te + infinitive. Leaving out om sounds slightly more formal, while adding it is very common in everyday spoken Dutch.

Learn Dit zware harnas was onmogelijk te dragen zonder een schild en een zwaard and more in Dutch

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free