Omdat de lava over de helling stroomt, belooft het een ramp te worden.

Questions & Answers about Omdat de lava over de helling stroomt, belooft het een ramp te worden.

Why is belooft translated as 'is likely to' instead of 'promises'?
In this grammar structure, beloven te is used figuratively to indicate that an outcome is highly probable based on current signs. While you can think of it literally as 'promises to become', translating it as 'is likely to' or 'looks set to' sounds much more natural in English.
Since a disaster is a negative event, couldn't we use dreigt (is at risk of) instead of belooft?
Yes, you could perfectly well say dreigt een ramp te worden. Both work for negative outcomes, but they highlight different things. Dreigt emphasizes the danger or looming threat of the situation, whereas belooft emphasizes the near-certainty of it: the flowing lava makes the disaster almost a sure bet.
Does the pronoun het refer back to de lava?
No. Because lava is a de-word, we would use hij or zij if we were referring directly back to it. In this sentence, het is a dummy subject, much like the 'it' in the English phrase 'it is likely to become a disaster.' It refers to the general unfolding situation.
Why does the main clause use the inverted word order belooft het?
The sentence begins with a subordinate clause (Omdat de lava over de helling stroomt). In Dutch sentence structure, this entire clause counts as the first position. To satisfy the rule that the main conjugated verb must come second, belooft comes immediately after the comma, pushing the subject (het) behind it.

Learn Omdat de lava over de helling stroomt, belooft het een ramp te worden and more in Dutch

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free