Breakdown of Als hij gisteren had gescoord, hadden we de beker gekregen.
hij
he / it (referring to a 'de'-word)
hebben
to have
gisteren
yesterday
we
we (unstressed form of wij)
Questions & Answers about Als hij gisteren had gescoord, hadden we de beker gekregen.
I thought 'would have received' translates to 'zouden hebben gekregen'. Why does this sentence use 'hadden ... gekregen' instead?
You can definitely use zouden hebben gekregen! However, in Dutch, it is very common to drop zouden in past 'what if' scenarios (past counterfactuals). When you do this, you simply use the past perfect tense in both halves of the sentence: had gescoord (had scored) and hadden gekregen (had received). It means exactly the same thing but often sounds more natural and less wordy.
Why is the word order 'hadden we' rather than 'we hadden' in the second half of the sentence?
This happens because of the V2 (verb second) rule. The entire first clause, Als hij gisteren had gescoord, acts as the first piece of information in the overall sentence. Therefore, the main verb (hadden) must take the second position, causing the subject (we) to flip behind it.
Is it possible to say 'gescoord had' instead of 'had gescoord' at the end of the first clause?
Yes, absolutely! In a subordinate clause (like one starting with Als), the auxiliary verb (had) and the past participle (gescoord) group together at the end. You can place them in either order: had gescoord or gescoord had. Both are perfectly correct and widely used.
Does 'de beker' mean 'the cup' like a sports trophy, or 'the cup' like something you drink out of?