Als hij gisteren had gescoord, hadden we de beker gekregen.

Questions & Answers about Als hij gisteren had gescoord, hadden we de beker gekregen.

I thought 'would have received' translates to 'zouden hebben gekregen'. Why does this sentence use 'hadden ... gekregen' instead?
You can definitely use zouden hebben gekregen! However, in Dutch, it is very common to drop zouden in past 'what if' scenarios (past counterfactuals). When you do this, you simply use the past perfect tense in both halves of the sentence: had gescoord (had scored) and hadden gekregen (had received). It means exactly the same thing but often sounds more natural and less wordy.
Why is the word order 'hadden we' rather than 'we hadden' in the second half of the sentence?
This happens because of the V2 (verb second) rule. The entire first clause, Als hij gisteren had gescoord, acts as the first piece of information in the overall sentence. Therefore, the main verb (hadden) must take the second position, causing the subject (we) to flip behind it.
Is it possible to say 'gescoord had' instead of 'had gescoord' at the end of the first clause?
Yes, absolutely! In a subordinate clause (like one starting with Als), the auxiliary verb (had) and the past participle (gescoord) group together at the end. You can place them in either order: had gescoord or gescoord had. Both are perfectly correct and widely used.
Does 'de beker' mean 'the cup' like a sports trophy, or 'the cup' like something you drink out of?
It means both! De beker can be a standard drinking cup or mug, but in a sports context like this one (where someone has gescoord), it refers to the championship trophy or tournament cup.

Learn Als hij gisteren had gescoord, hadden we de beker gekregen and more in Dutch

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free