Hoewel de prins de fee heeft willen bedanken, is ze verdwenen.

Questions & Answers about Hoewel de prins de fee heeft willen bedanken, is ze verdwenen.

Why is heeft placed before willen bedanken at the end of the first clause?
In a subordinate clause (like the one starting with Hoewel), verbs are pushed to the end. When you have a double infinitive like willen bedanken, the conjugated auxiliary verb (here, heeft) must be placed right before the infinitive cluster. You cannot put it at the very end like you might with a single past participle.
Why do we use the infinitive willen instead of the past participle gewild?
This is the double infinitive rule. When a modal verb like willen is used in the perfect tense alongside another verb (bedanken), it changes from a past participle into an infinitive. So instead of using gewild, Dutch uses the double infinitive heeft willen bedanken.
Why does the second part say is ze verdwenen instead of ze is verdwenen?
The entire first clause (Hoewel... bedanken) acts as a single block taking up the first position in the overall sentence. Because Dutch uses verb-second word order, the conjugated verb of the main clause (is) must come exactly in the second position, swapping places with the subject (ze).
Why is it is ze verdwenen rather than heeft ze verdwenen?
The verb verdwijnen (to disappear) expresses a change of state or condition. Intransitive verbs that indicate a change of state always form their perfect tense with zijn (to be) rather than hebben (to have).

Learn Hoewel de prins de fee heeft willen bedanken, is ze verdwenen and more in Dutch

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free