Het onbekende blijkt vaak heel logisch te zijn.

Questions & Answers about Het onbekende blijkt vaak heel logisch te zijn.

Why is it het onbekende and not de onbekende?
When you turn an adjective into a noun to talk about a general, abstract concept (like "the unknown" or "the good"), you always use the neuter article het. If you used de, making it de onbekende, it would refer to a specific unknown person (a stranger).
Why does onbekend get an -e at the end here?
When an adjective is used as a noun (nominalized), it almost always gets an -e added to the end. It changes from the base describing word onbekend (unknown) to the noun het onbekende (the unknown thing/concept).
How does the structure blijkt ... te zijn work?
The verb blijken means "to turn out" or "to appear to be". It is very commonly paired with te + an infinitive verb. Here, blijkt is the main verb, and te zijn (to be) gets pushed to the very end of the sentence, which is the standard rule for extra verbs in Dutch.
Why doesn't logisch get an -e at the end like onbekende?
Logisch is functioning as a normal adjective here, describing the subject rather than acting as a noun. Because it comes after the verb it is paired with (like saying "the car is fast"), it keeps its base form and does not get an -e ending.

Learn Het onbekende blijkt vaak heel logisch te zijn and more in Dutch

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free