Questions & Answers about Hvis jeg havde tid, ville jeg læse mere.
Why does the second part of the sentence say ville jeg instead of jeg ville?
This happens because of the Danish V2 rule, which says the verb must be the second idea in a main sentence. The entire first part (Hvis jeg havde tid) counts as position number one. To keep the verb in the second position, the second part must start immediately with the verb (ville) before the subject (jeg).
Why is the past tense havde used if this isn't a story about the past?
Just like in English, Danish uses the past tense to talk about hypothetical or unreal situations. Using havde (had) instead of har (have) signals that you are just imagining this scenario and don't actually have the time right now.
Doesn't ville usually mean 'wanted to'?
It can, because ville is the past tense of vil (which often means 'want'). However, in hypothetical sentences like this one, ville acts just like the English word 'would'. You pair it with an infinitive verb (læse) to say what you 'would do'.
Would the word order change if I swapped the two halves of the sentence?
Yes! If you put the main part first, it would follow standard order: Jeg ville læse mere, hvis jeg havde tid. Because the 'if' phrase is no longer at the start of the sentence, you don't need to flip the verb and subject in the main part.