Breakdown of Stadgan säger att om du får en varning, har du en skyldighet att svara.
du
you (singular)
en
a, an (common)
ha
to have
att
to
Questions & Answers about Stadgan säger att om du får en varning, har du en skyldighet att svara.
Why is it har du instead of du har right after the comma?
This highlights the core rule for nested subordinate clauses. The entire thought after att functions as one large subclause. Because this large subclause starts with its own smaller "if" clause (om du får en varning), that "if" clause takes up the first position. To satisfy the V2 (verb-second) rule for the rest of the statement, the verb har must immediately follow the comma, causing the inverted word order har du.
Would the word order change if we removed the om clause?
Yes! If we take out the condition, the sentence becomes Stadgan säger att du har en skyldighet att svara. Without the nested om clause taking up the first position, the att clause goes back to the normal straight word order for subclauses: subject (du) followed by the verb (har).
What exactly is Stadgan?
It is the definite singular form of en stadga, which means a statute, charter, or bylaw. It is used in formal contexts to describe the binding written rules of an organization, foundation, or association. This formal document justifies the slightly legalistic phrasing of having an "obligation" (en skyldighet) later in the sentence.
Can I drop the word att in a sentence structure like this?