Breakdown of Om han inte hade tvekat, skulle han inte ha missat tillfället.
han
he
inte
not
ha
to have
missa
to miss
om
if, whether
skulle
would
tveka
to hesitate
tillfället
the opportunity (occasion)
Questions & Answers about Om han inte hade tvekat, skulle han inte ha missat tillfället.
How does the first part of the sentence show that we are talking about a hypothetical past?
It uses om (if) followed by the past perfect tense hade tvekat (had hesitated). This combination is how Swedish builds an unreal past condition, meaning we are imagining a past event that didn't actually happen.
Why does the second part use skulle ha missat instead of just a past tense verb?
To express what would have happened in that imaginary past, Swedish uses the structure skulle (would) + ha (have) + the supinum form of the main verb, which in this case is missat (missed).
Why is the word order skulle han and not han skulle after the comma?
This is the V2 (verb-second) rule in action. The entire 'if' clause (Om han inte hade tvekat) acts as the first block of information in the sentence. Therefore, the main clause must start immediately with the verb (skulle), pushing the subject (han) right after it.
Why is inte placed before the verb in the first clause, but after the verb in the second clause?
This is a great example of the difference between subordinate and main clauses. The first part is a subordinate clause (started by om), where sentence adverbs like inte must go before the first verb (hade). The second part is a main clause, where inte goes after the first verb and subject (skulle han).
Learn Om han inte hade tvekat, skulle han inte ha missat tillfället and more in Swedish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free