El plato no es tan picante como para que suavices el sabor.

Questions & Answers about El plato no es tan picante como para que suavices el sabor.

Why do we use como para que suavices here instead of just como para suavizar?
We use como para que followed by the subjunctive (suavices) because there is a change of subject. The first subject is the dish (el plato), and the second subject is you (the person softening the flavor). If the sentence didn't have a specific second subject doing the action, you would use the infinitive: ...como para suavizar el sabor (not spicy enough to soften the flavor).
The translation says "spicy enough", but the Spanish uses tan picante. Why not use a word like suficiente?
The structure tan [adjective] como para... literally translates to "so [adjective] as to...". In conversational Spanish, this is the most natural and common way to express the idea of reaching a threshold, like being "X enough to do Y".
Why is suavices spelled with a "c" instead of a "z" like in its infinitive form suavizar?
This is a standard spelling rule. In Spanish, the letter "z" is rarely followed by an "e" or an "i". Because forming the present subjunctive for an -ar verb like suavizar requires an -e ending (suavices), the z must change to a c to maintain the correct pronunciation.
The sentence uses es in no es tan picante. Could we use está instead?
Yes, but the nuance changes. Using ser (es) implies that this dish is generally or inherently not a spicy type of food. If you used estar (está), it would mean that this specific plate of food you are tasting right now didn't turn out very spicy, regardless of what the recipe usually dictates.

Learn El plato no es tan picante como para que suavices el sabor and more in Spanish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free